[blind-democracy] Re: Climate movement defeats XL pipeline

  • From: "Charles Krugman" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "ckrugman" for DMARC)
  • To: <blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 01:00:24 -0800

and after all this in light of the defeat of the Keystone XL pipe line we have Republican Presidential candidates and busines interests wanting to try to bring it back.
Chuck

-----Original Message----- From: Roger Loran Bailey (Redacted sender "rogerbailey81" for DMARC)
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 8:06 AM
To: blind-democracy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [blind-democracy] Climate movement defeats XL pipeline

http://socialistaction.org/climate-movement-defeats-xl-pipeline/


Climate movement defeats XL pipeline

Published November 17, 2015. | By Socialist Action.
Nov. 2015 XL protest

By CARL SACK

On Nov. 6, U.S. President Barack Obama formally denied TransCanada’s
application for approval of the Keystone XL oil pipeline.

The 1200-mile-long pipeline would have carried heavy crude oil (called
bitumen) from tar-sands mines in northern Alberta, Canada, across the
U.S. Great Plains states to oil refineries on the Gulf Coast. Tar-sands
oil is the most carbon-intensive energy source ever exploited, and its
full development has been called “game over for the climate” by NASA
climate scientist James Hansen.

Obama’s decision to nix the pipeline a month before the Paris climate
summit is a momentous victory for the growing mass movement against
climate change. National organizations such as 350.org, CREDO, Rising
Tide, and the Sierra Club have worked to focus international media
attention on the Keystone pipeline over the past five years.

Obama himself said in his statement on the decision that the pipeline
occupied “an overinflated role in our political discourse”—a role that
only came to pass after the mass movement forced it into the national
spotlight through protests, blockades, and mass arrests at the White
House that challenged what was originally widely considered a done deal.

“Just a few years ago, insiders and experts wrote us off and assured the
world Keystone XL would be built by the end of 2011. Together, ranchers,
tribal nations and everyday people beat this project back, reminding the
world that Big Oil isn’t invincible—and that hope is a renewable
resource,” says a statement by 350.org Executive Director May Boeve on
the group’s website.

The resistance to Keystone was spearheaded by local and regional
coalitions like Bold Nebraska and the Cowboy Indian Alliance, which
overcame animosity between white ranchers and Native American tribes in
the Great Plains and blockaded parts of the project. Once they took
notice, national organizations provided networking and publicity to
build local protests around the country and mass civil disobedience in
Washington, D.C. Much of the energy for the movement came from young
people looking for ways to oppose the ecocidal actions of fossil-fuel
companies and nonsensical U.S. climate policy.

These protests culminated in the massive People’s Climate March in
September 2014, which drew over 400,000 activists to New York City in
the largest U.S. protest against climate change to date. That march
would have been even more powerful had it made explicit demands on the
country’s political rulers for a swift transition away from fossil
fuels. Nonetheless, it put the government on notice that a do-nothing
stance on climate change is no longer tolerable to a growing proportion
of the population. It demonstrated the possibility of a powerful mass
movement around climate change taking shape.

Environmental journalist Bill McKibben, 350.org’s founder, gave a
realistic assessment of the Keystone victory in an op-ed in The
Guardian: “Given a realistic chance to affect the future, people are
ready to take action. … Today was a good goal scored, but we’re still
way behind. … There’s no guarantee that we can beat climate change, but
there’s every guarantee we’re going to give it a hell of a fight.”

Until now, unfortunately, the strategies of national groups like 350.org
and the Sierra Club have resulted in their being slow to tackle some
pipeline projects that are worse than Keystone XL. A 2013 Open Letter to
the Anti-Tar Sands Movement from the Michigan Coalition Against Tar
Sands, which is fighting Enbridge Energy tar sands pipelines in that
state, reads in part, “The constant focus of the tar sands narrative
around the President as the ultimate decision maker is … disempowering
to communities bearing the burden of existing infrastructure. … While
kxl is a large part of the problem, it is time for the mainstream
movement’s figureheads to stop exclusively referring to this pipeline
and discouraging us from working on other tar sands issues.”

350.org relies on local groups to take on powerful multinational
fossil-fuel corporations first. Their national committee selects local
issues to support based on which fights have legs, leadership, and
strategic value. This approach, at least so far, has allowed several
cross-border pipelines bigger than Keystone to slip by under the radar.

To their credit, 350 has taken on a raft of other climate-change
initiatives, from international fossil-fuel divestment to fighting the
expansion of coal and tar-sands mines. The group is playing a major role
in organizing international protests around the upcoming Paris Climate
Talks.

In the Sierra Club, little attention was paid to pipeline projects other
than Keystone until local chapters around the country demanded that the
national organization allocate resources to fighting them. There are now
efforts within the Club to coordinate local pipeline fights.

In Minnesota and Wisconsin, Enbridge Energy LLC has been rapidly
expanding its Lakehead Pipeline system for years to accommodate both
tar-sands oil and oil from the Bakken fields of western North Dakota,
eastern Montana, and southern Manitoba and Saskatchewan. Local
coalitions, including 350.org and Sierra Club chapters, are fighting the
expansion.

Enbridge plans to triple the capacity of its Line 61 pipeline, which
crosses Wisconsin lengthwise, including virtually all of the state’s
major waterways. It will soon carry up to 1.2 million barrels of
tar-sands bitumen per day, and was already up to 950,000 barrels per day
in October. In addition, the company is now mulling over whether to
build a new “twin” line alongside 61 that would carry another 450,000
barrels per day, bringing the total up to 1.65 million. The maximum
capacity planned for Keystone XL was half that—830,000 barrels per day.

Every capacity increase promises to result in new oil spills that are
poisonous to drinking water, deadly for wildlife, and very difficult to
clean up. A 2010 report by the National Wildlife Federation outed
Enbridge’s atrocious safety record, which then consisted of over 800
spills since 2000, including a 2008 spill that released over 1 million
gallons of oil into Michigan’s Kalamazoo River. Cleanup from that spill
is ongoing.

Unlike Keystone, which public pressure forced a lengthy review of,
Enbridge pipelines that cross the U.S.-Canada border have received the
red carpet treatment from the Obama administration. The U.S. State
Department rushed to approve the company’s application to divert oil
from one existing border crossing to another, thus avoiding a
requirement for a presidential permit like the one that ultimately
stopped Keystone.

Enbridge directly credits the failure of Keystone XL for giving them the
market to transport tar sands. “Now that we’ve got demand from our
shippers … [they] have asked us to bring the capacity up,” an Enbridge
spokesperson told the author in July 2014, when the expansion was on the
drawing board.

Other companies are building pipelines as well. According to The New
York Times, two million barrels of new oil pipeline capacity has come on
line in the Gulf of Mexico region over the past three years, and more
lines are planned. But there is growing resistance to new oil pipelines
on the local level that could strengthen and rejuvenate the mass
movement—if grassroots activists are given the publicity and resources
that national groups have to offer.

On Nov. 2, seven protesters in Duluth, Minn., were arrested during an
occupation of the Enbridge offices there. That protest was organized by
a coalition of Native American and non-Native activists. Honor the
Earth, a Native American non-profit group based in Bemidji, Minn., has
organized multiple horse-riding protests and blockades against the
company’s proposed Sandpiper Pipeline, which would transport oil from
the Bakken deposits to Midwestern refineries.

In Western Canada, First Nations groups are fighting Enbridge’s Northern
Gateway pipeline project. That project would include two parallel
pipelines between western Alberta and a marine terminal in British
Columbia, transporting tar-sands crude westward for export to Asia, and
natural gas condensate eastward. The Stephen Harper administration
approved the project on Oct. 5, but many legal challenges and potential
mass civil-disobedience campaigns lie ahead.

First Nations are also fighting Kinder Morgan’s proposal to expand its
Trans Mountain pipeline, which runs from the Alberta tar sands to a
Vancouver-area port, from 300,000 to 890,000 barrels per day.

Sixty-six First Nations signed the Save the Fraser Declaration in 2010,
declaring that they would not allow any tar-sands pipelines to cross
their territories. The group spearheading the declaration, the Yinka
Dene Alliance, also has released open letters to the Chinese people—the
future recipients of most B.C. oil shipments—appealing for solidarity.
It has filed complaints with the United Nations Committee on the
Elimination of Racial Discrimination, claiming that the pipeline
infringes on Aboriginal land titles. The Alliance has been the victim of
spying by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

In a model for American workers, Unifor, Canada’s largest private-sector
union, has thrown its support and solidarity behind the First Nations
opponents of tar sands. Unifor represents some 310,000 Canadian workers,
including workers in tar-sands refineries. They are calling both for the
oil to be processed domestically rather than shipped abroad, and for a
transition to renewable energy sources.

In the U.S., the United Steelworkers, Amalgamated Transit Union,
National Domestic Workers Alliance, and three nurses unions opposed the
Keystone pipeline. Unfortunately, building-trades unions were
universally and vocally in favor of the project, and the executive
committee of the national AFL-CIO passed a statement in support of
building more pipelines.

This very short-sighted enthusiasm for oil pipelines rests on the basis
of its providing short-term construction jobs. According to Politifact,
the 875-mile-long northern segment of Keystone would have created 3900
construction jobs over two years but only 50 long-term operating
positions. Other pipelines have similar job numbers.

Rather than pushing for a 180-degree pivot to clean renewable energy
sources, which could employ many times the number of workers as
pipelines, many U.S. labor misleaders applaud the expansion of U.S. and
Canadian pipeline systems and other fossil fuel projects that threaten
human existence through their impacts on the climate.

Climate activists should seek to win over unions by pointing out that
there are no jobs on a dead planet and demanding a just transition to
renewables with guaranteed full employment at union wages for displaced
fossil-fuel workers. To bring the disparate struggles over local
projects together into a cohesive whole, we need a broad-based,
democratic, politically independent, and mass action-oriented coalition
that can create cohesive demands and pilot the overall movement.

The upcoming Paris climate talks provide an opportunity to move forward
in this vein. Capitalist world powers are planning for an international
carbon-emissions agreement that many expect will allow for an overall
increase in emissions, which could set a course for a catastrophic
temperature increase of 4 degrees centigrade or more. Climatologists
have warned that any increase over 1 degree poses severe threats to
human society, but we are currently on track for a 4-6 degrees rise by 2100.

350.org has called for a “global weekend of action” on Nov. 28-29,
consisting of local actions around the country. In a note of progress
since the People’s Climate March, the group now is promoting the general
demand to “keep fossil fuels in the ground and finance a just transition
to 100% renewable energy by 2050.”

Globally, there will be mass protests in many larger cities, culminating
in what is expected to be the largest mass mobilization around climate
change to date, in Paris on Dec. 12. The London-based Campaign Against
Climate Change is planning a mass protest on Nov. 29. In the U.S., the
NorCal Climate Mobilization, a coalition of environmental and labor
groups, is organizing a rally on Nov. 21 in Oakland, Calif.

Such protests are important opportunities for building the movement. We
encourage all readers to attend one of the planned mobilizations, or to
bring fellow activists together to build one in your local area. All out
to save the climate!





Share this:

Facebook
Twitter
Google
Tumblr




Posted in Actions & Protest, Environment. | Tagged 350.org, climate,
global warming, pipeline.







Get Involved


Join Socialist Action
Donate to help support our work
Get email updates
Events






Subscribe to Our Newspaper


JAN. 2014 p.1 jpegJAN. 2014 p. 12












Subscribe Today



Subscriptions to the monthly print edition of Socialist Action are
available for the following rates:

- 12 month subscription for $20
- 24 month subscription for $37
- 6 month subscription for $10







Learn More






Email Updates



Enter your email address to subscribe to our free e-mail Socialist
Action Newsletter. Also to receive notifcations of new web posts by email.







Learn More






Newspaper Archives

Newspaper Archives Select Month November 2015 (5) October 2015 (8)
September 2015 (10) August 2015 (7) July 2015 (13) June 2015 (9) May
2015 (10) April 2015 (12) March 2015 (9) February 2015 (11) January
2015 (10) December 2014 (12) November 2014 (11) October 2014 (9)
September 2014 (6) August 2014 (10) July 2014 (11) June 2014 (10)
May 2014 (11) April 2014 (10) March 2014 (9) February 2014 (11)
January 2014 (11) December 2013 (10) November 2013 (11) October 2013
(17) September 2013 (13) August 2013 (10) July 2013 (11) June 2013
(15) May 2013 (14) April 2013 (14) March 2013 (12) February 2013
(10) January 2013 (17) December 2012 (7) November 2012 (8) October
2012 (19) September 2012 (2) August 2012 (27) July 2012 (18) June
2012 (3) May 2012 (19) April 2012 (14) March 2012 (17) February 2012
(19) January 2012 (17) December 2011 (3) November 2011 (33) October
2011 (14) September 2011 (13) August 2011 (34) July 2011 (24) June
2011 (19) May 2011 (19) April 2011 (15) March 2011 (15) February
2011 (16) January 2011 (15) December 2010 (17) November 2010 (1)
October 2010 (6) September 2010 (3) August 2010 (8) July 2010 (7)
June 2010 (2) May 2010 (9) April 2010 (3) March 2010 (8) February
2010 (3) January 2010 (9) December 2009 (6) November 2009 (5)
October 2009 (16) September 2009 (3) August 2009 (2) July 2009 (5)
June 2009 (2) May 2009 (7) April 2009 (6) March 2009 (16) February
2009 (9) January 2009 (10) December 2008 (11) November 2008 (8)
October 2008 (16) September 2008 (14) August 2008 (18) July 2008
(12) June 2008 (3) May 2008 (2) April 2008 (3) March 2008 (14)
February 2008 (11) January 2008 (11) December 2007 (8) November 2007
(1) July 2007 (1) June 2007 (1) April 2007 (1) March 2007 (1)
February 2007 (3) December 2006 (11) November 2006 (11) October 2006
(13) September 2006 (15) August 2006 (11) July 2006 (12) June 2006
(7) May 2006 (14) April 2006 (6) March 2006 (14) February 2006 (5)
January 2006 (2) December 2005 (9) November 2005 (8) October 2005
(13) September 2005 (12) August 2005 (9) July 2005 (16) June 2005
(16) May 2005 (16) April 2005 (12) March 2005 (14) February 2005 (19)
January 2005 (15) December 2004 (14) November 2002 (17) October 2002
(19) September 2002 (22) August 2002 (21) July 2002 (15) May 2002
(21) April 2002 (21) February 2002 (15) January 2002 (15) December
2001 (17) October 2001 (24) September 2001 (18) July 2001 (19) June
2001 (18) October 2000 (17) September 2000 (21) August 2000 (19)
July 2000 (16) June 2000 (26) May 2000 (21) April 2000 (22) March
2000 (28) February 2000 (18) January 2000 (20) December 1999 (20)
November 1999 (26) October 1999 (25) September 1999 (18) August 1999
(40) July 1999 (38) June 1999 (24) May 1999 (27) April 1999 (25)
March 1999 (26) February 1999 (29) January 1999 (24) July 1998 (12)
0 (2)







Learn More






Pamphlets/Books



Socialist Action publishes a wide variety of pamphlets on burning issues
of today such as global warming, women’s liberation, the Middle East and
other subjects.







Learn More





Socialist Action (U.S.): socialistaction@xxxxxxx | (510) 268-9429

Socialist Action / Ligue pour l’Action socialiste (Canada):
barryaw@xxxxxxxxxx

Copyright © 2015 Socialist Action. All Rights Reserved. Site Design by
Lucid Digital Designs | Site Utilities





Other related posts: