Put this together with what Nick Terse has been writing about the US
military in Africa and it gets really scarey.
Miriam
Big Business, Big Guns and Big Lies in Africa
Submitted by Mark P. Fancher on Wed, 12/16/2015 - 07:10
. Africa Land Grab
by Mark P. Fancher
Africa has been invaded and re-occupied, militarily and commercially.
"Non-African superpowers are competing for and staking claims to Africa's
resources while Africans look on with helpless resignation." The U.S.
military holds sway from the Cape to Cairo. But, "in the 21st Century
'scramble for Africa' China leads the race."
Big Business, Big Guns and Big Lies in Africa
by Mark P. Fancher
"The Chinese presence is perhaps greatest in Ethiopia."
One of the world's worst kept secrets is that the United States has
incrementally established a military presence in Africa from the "Cape to
Cairo." Notwithstanding claims that the military is needed there to thwart
terrorism and provide Africans with humanitarian assistance, the real reason
for U.S. military expansion is protection of corporate interests.
On any given day the website of U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) showcases
several articles about U.S. military personnel providing medical supplies to
rural African villages, or rolling up their sleeves to assist with bringing
clean drinking water to devastated regions. Still other articles describe
special anti-terrorist training and joint military exercises provided to
soldiers in the African countries' armies. It is all presented with such a
distinct air of benevolence that a casual observer can remain totally
unaware of the underlying corporate mission.
AFRICOM has not been forthcoming about the corporate lust for economic
opportunities in Africa, but the White House has been quite candid. A $14
billion investment by U.S. companies in infrastructure projects in Africa
last year prompted a White House official to comment to journalists: "These
investments will deepen U.S. economic engagement in Africa, fueling growth
that will support broader African prosperity and emerging markets for U.S.
businesses, which will support jobs in both the United States and Africa."
However, when it comes to the presence of the U.S. military in Africa and
its role in carrying out a corporate agenda, the U.S. government as a whole
has not been as transparent. There is nevertheless plenty of evidence that
can be used to connect the dots. China's African adventure is instructive in
this regard.
"Chinese settlements are being built, de facto, in nearly every African
nation."
By all accounts, in the 21st Century "scramble for Africa" China leads the
race. Stephen Hayes, President of the Corporate Council on Africa explained
to The Cipher Brief: "China is looking at every country on the continent,
north to south, east to west. We (the U.S.) continue to focus on a few,
particularly where the markets are large and the potential is equally so.
Certainly China is engaged in the extraction industries in order to feed its
own economy, but I see a far broader engagement in nearly every sector of
the economy. This is especially so when you realize that Chinese settlements
are being built, de facto, in nearly every African nation. They are actively
engaged in small shop business, as well as in large enterprises. I don't
know that Africa has ever seen such engagement, even in the colonial past."
Hayes also notes that the Chinese presence is perhaps greatest in Ethiopia.
He said: "China's investment in Ethiopia is enormous and is still
well-received by the leadership. Sure, they would like other countries but
China is making an enormous difference for Ethiopia right now." Any good
capitalist knows that large investments must be protected. Thus, it should
come as no surprise that China has announced plans to build a military base
in Djibouti, which is in geographical proximity to Ethiopia, and which is
the same country that is home to the largest U.S. military base in Africa,
Camp Lemonnier.
If China believes its military must protect Chinese investments, there is no
reason why the U.S. should expect anyone to believe the lie that the U.S.
military presence in Africa is driven by different motives. In fact, if
humanitarian assistance and anti-terrorism were the dominant reasons for
U.S. military engagement in Africa, U.S. officials would be far less jittery
about China's recent moves. Delaware Senator Chris Coons' comments betray
U.S. fears. He told The Hill: "Overall, China's presence in Africa is
certainly something we need to pay more attention to, but not just in
Djibouti. Africa's middle class is growing faster than ever, and the
continent offers great opportunities for partnerships between both
governments and the private sector. We don't want to lose out on those
opportunities to Chinese companies or the Chinese government, whose
interests might not always align with ours."
"African heads of state pursue the most expedient avenues for the extraction
and processing of their respective national, natural resources."
The U.S. military presence in Africa is already extensive, but the new
Chinese military base may prompt even greater expansion. In comments to The
Hill, analyst J. Peter Pham said: "U.S. global leadership is predicated
heavily on the U.S. role in protecting and to an extent controlling sea
lanes of communication. If China establishes itself as a fellow protector of
the global commons, then it certainly increases its stature." Thus,
military brass are likely to conclude that an even stronger U.S. armed
presence can preserve military dominance in Africa and bolster non-military
efforts to romance China's new friends. Notably, Ethiopia's prime minister
has been invited to be the keynote speaker at an upcoming U.S.-Africa
business summit sponsored by: Chevron, Exxon-Mobil, AstraZenica, John Deere,
Microsoft, Ford Motor Company and a couple of dozen other major
corporations.
The spectacle of non-African superpowers competing for and staking claims to
Africa's resources while Africans look on with helpless resignation is a
tired, pathetic movie that we have seen multiple times before. It never has
a happy ending. The re-runs keep coming because African heads of state who
pursue the most expedient avenues for the extraction and processing of their
respective national, natural resources allow themselves to be seduced or
bullied into subservient relationships with non-African corporations and
governments. Freedom from these relationships will come only when Africa
learns it can and must be completely self-reliant and self-sufficient. The
path to this type of genuine liberation is a long, difficult one because it
will require first the purging of non-African corporate and government
parasites from the continent. This task will be considerably more difficult
if foreign militaries are entrenched in Africa. Because African politicians
who seek a quick fix will be unwilling to walk this revolutionary path, it
must instead be traveled by the broad masses of Africa's people and the
people of the continent's diaspora.
Mark P. Fancher is an attorney who writes frequently about the U.S. military
presence in Africa. He can be contacted at mfancher@xxxxxxxxxxx.
Skip to main content
/ /
Black Agenda Report
News, information and analysis from the black left.
http://twitter.com/share?url=&text=Big Business, Big Guns and Big Lies in
Africa via @blkagendareport http://twitter.com/share?url=&text=Big
Business, Big Guns and Big Lies in Africa via @blkagendareport
http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=&t=Big Business, Big Guns and Big Lies
in Africa http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=&t=Big Business, Big Guns and
Big Lies in Africa
http://www.google.com/bookmarks/mark?op=add&bkmk=&title=Big Business, Big
Guns and Big Lies in Africa
http://www.google.com/bookmarks/mark?op=add&bkmk=&title=Big Business, Big
Guns and Big Lies in Africa
http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=&title=Big Business, Big Guns and Big
Lies in Africa http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=&title=Big Business,
Big Guns and Big Lies in Africa
http://del.icio.us/post?url=&title=Big Business, Big Guns and Big Lies in
Africa http://del.icio.us/post?url=&title=Big Business, Big Guns and Big
Lies in Africa
http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=&title=Big Business, Big Guns and Big
Lies in Africa http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=&title=Big Business, Big
Guns and Big Lies in Africa
http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=&title=Big Business, Big
Guns and Big Lies in Africa
http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=&title=Big Business, Big
Guns and Big Lies in Africa
http://www.newsvine.com/_tools/seed&save?u=&h=Big Business, Big Guns and Big
Lies in Africa http://www.newsvine.com/_tools/seed&save?u=&h=Big Business,
Big Guns and Big Lies in Africa
javascript:void((function()%7Bvar
e=document.createElement('script');e.setAttribute('type','text/javascript');
e.setAttribute('charset','UTF-8');e.setAttribute('src','http://assets.pinter
est.com/js/pinmarklet.js?r='+Math.random()*99999999);document.body.appendChi
ld(e)%7D)()); javascript:void((function()%7Bvar
e=document.createElement('script');e.setAttribute('type','text/javascript');
e.setAttribute('charset','UTF-8');e.setAttribute('src','http://assets.pinter
est.com/js/pinmarklet.js?r='+Math.random()*99999999);document.body.appendChi
ld(e)%7D)());
http://reddit.com/submit?url=&title=Big Business, Big Guns and Big Lies in
Africa http://reddit.com/submit?url=&title=Big Business, Big Guns and Big
Lies in Africa
http://bookmarks.yahoo.com/myresults/bookmarklet?u=&t=Big Business, Big Guns
and Big Lies in Africa
http://bookmarks.yahoo.com/myresults/bookmarklet?u=&t=Big Business, Big Guns
and Big Lies in Africa
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
&&&&&&&&&&&&
Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.
You are here
1. Blogs
2. > Mark P. Fancher's blog
Big Business, Big Guns and Big Lies in Africa
Submitted by Mark P. Fancher on Wed, 12/16/2015 - 07:10
. Africa Land Grab
Share this story...
. http://blackagendareport.com/forward?path=node/4856 Forward
. http://blackagendareport.com/print/big_business_guns_lies_africa
Print HTML
.
http://reddit.com/submit?url=http%3A//blackagendareport.com/node/4856&title=
Big%20Business%2C%20Big%20Guns%20and%20Big%20Lies%20in%20Africa Reddit
.
http://www.viadeo.com/shareit/share/?url=http%3A//blackagendareport.com/node
/4856&title=Big%20Business%2C%20Big%20Guns%20and%20Big%20Lies%20in%20Africa
Viadeo
. inShare
. /big_business_guns_lies_africa /big_business_guns_lies_africa
. by Mark P. Fancher
. Africa has been invaded and re-occupied, militarily and
commercially. "Non-African superpowers are competing for and staking claims
to Africa's resources while Africans look on with helpless resignation." The
U.S. military holds sway from the Cape to Cairo. But, "in the 21st Century
'scramble for Africa' China leads the race."
Big Business, Big Guns and Big Lies in Africa
by Mark P. Fancher
"The Chinese presence is perhaps greatest in Ethiopia."
One of the world's worst kept secrets is that the United States has
incrementally established a military presence in Africa from the "Cape to
Cairo." Notwithstanding claims that the military is needed there to thwart
terrorism and provide Africans with humanitarian assistance, the real reason
for U.S. military expansion is protection of corporate interests.
On any given day the website of U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) showcases
several articles about U.S. military personnel providing medical supplies to
rural African villages, or rolling up their sleeves to assist with bringing
clean drinking water to devastated regions. Still other articles describe
special anti-terrorist training and joint military exercises provided to
soldiers in the African countries' armies. It is all presented with such a
distinct air of benevolence that a casual observer can remain totally
unaware of the underlying corporate mission.
AFRICOM has not been forthcoming about the corporate lust for economic
opportunities in Africa, but the White House has been quite candid. A $14
billion investment by U.S. companies in infrastructure projects in Africa
last year prompted a White House official to comment to journalists: "These
investments will deepen U.S. economic engagement in Africa, fueling growth
that will support broader African prosperity and emerging markets for U.S.
businesses, which will support jobs in both the United States and Africa."
However, when it comes to the presence of the U.S. military in Africa and
its role in carrying out a corporate agenda, the U.S. government as a whole
has not been as transparent. There is nevertheless plenty of evidence that
can be used to connect the dots. China's African adventure is instructive in
this regard.
"Chinese settlements are being built, de facto, in nearly every African
nation."
By all accounts, in the 21st Century "scramble for Africa" China leads the
race. Stephen Hayes, President of the Corporate Council on Africa explained
to The Cipher Brief: "China is looking at every country on the continent,
north to south, east to west. We (the U.S.) continue to focus on a few,
particularly where the markets are large and the potential is equally so.
Certainly China is engaged in the extraction industries in order to feed its
own economy, but I see a far broader engagement in nearly every sector of
the economy. This is especially so when you realize that Chinese settlements
are being built, de facto, in nearly every African nation. They are actively
engaged in small shop business, as well as in large enterprises. I don't
know that Africa has ever seen such engagement, even in the colonial past."
Hayes also notes that the Chinese presence is perhaps greatest in Ethiopia.
He said: "China's investment in Ethiopia is enormous and is still
well-received by the leadership. Sure, they would like other countries but
China is making an enormous difference for Ethiopia right now." Any good
capitalist knows that large investments must be protected. Thus, it should
come as no surprise that China has announced plans to build a military base
in Djibouti, which is in geographical proximity to Ethiopia, and which is
the same country that is home to the largest U.S. military base in Africa,
Camp Lemonnier.
If China believes its military must protect Chinese investments, there is no
reason why the U.S. should expect anyone to believe the lie that the U.S.
military presence in Africa is driven by different motives. In fact, if
humanitarian assistance and anti-terrorism were the dominant reasons for
U.S. military engagement in Africa, U.S. officials would be far less jittery
about China's recent moves. Delaware Senator Chris Coons' comments betray
U.S. fears. He told The Hill: "Overall, China's presence in Africa is
certainly something we need to pay more attention to, but not just in
Djibouti. Africa's middle class is growing faster than ever, and the
continent offers great opportunities for partnerships between both
governments and the private sector. We don't want to lose out on those
opportunities to Chinese companies or the Chinese government, whose
interests might not always align with ours."
"African heads of state pursue the most expedient avenues for the extraction
and processing of their respective national, natural resources."
The U.S. military presence in Africa is already extensive, but the new
Chinese military base may prompt even greater expansion. In comments to The
Hill, analyst J. Peter Pham said: "U.S. global leadership is predicated
heavily on the U.S. role in protecting and to an extent controlling sea
lanes of communication. If China establishes itself as a fellow protector of
the global commons, then it certainly increases its stature." Thus, military
brass are likely to conclude that an even stronger U.S. armed presence can
preserve military dominance in Africa and bolster non-military efforts to
romance China's new friends. Notably, Ethiopia's prime minister has been
invited to be the keynote speaker at an upcoming U.S.-Africa business summit
sponsored by: Chevron, Exxon-Mobil, AstraZenica, John Deere, Microsoft, Ford
Motor Company and a couple of dozen other major corporations.
The spectacle of non-African superpowers competing for and staking claims to
Africa's resources while Africans look on with helpless resignation is a
tired, pathetic movie that we have seen multiple times before. It never has
a happy ending. The re-runs keep coming because African heads of state who
pursue the most expedient avenues for the extraction and processing of their
respective national, natural resources allow themselves to be seduced or
bullied into subservient relationships with non-African corporations and
governments. Freedom from these relationships will come only when Africa
learns it can and must be completely self-reliant and self-sufficient. The
path to this type of genuine liberation is a long, difficult one because it
will require first the purging of non-African corporate and government
parasites from the continent. This task will be considerably more difficult
if foreign militaries are entrenched in Africa. Because African politicians
who seek a quick fix will be unwilling to walk this revolutionary path, it
must instead be traveled by the broad masses of Africa's people and the
people of the continent's diaspora.
Mark P. Fancher is an attorney who writes frequently about the U.S. military
presence in Africa. He can be contacted at mfancher@xxxxxxxxxxx.
