The link to the video is on the Truthdig email I received and the video
describes a eugenics laboratory on Long Island, concerned with purifying the
white race.
Miriam
6 Times U.S. Government Excluded Millions Based on Race or Religion (Video)
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/top_6_times_us_government_excluded_milli
ons_race_religion_20151209/
Posted on Dec 9, 2015
By Juan Cole
This post originally ran on Truthdig contributor Juan Cole's website.
Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and other bigots on the far right are nothing new in
American history. Rather, they remind us of the worst and most shameful
detours of the American Republic in the past. From the mid-nineteenth
century racial theory became prominent in European and American discourse,
in which peoples were conceived of as endogamous (only marrying among
themselves and so producing 'pure' and 'less pure' 'races.') In contrast,
in the 18th century most Western thinkers believed the differences among
peoples had to do with climate and diet. The nineteenth century Romantic
notion of race is a fantasy-people get all mixed up over time.
But it would be a mistake to think race was the only consideration in
American xenophobia (hatred for foreigners). Powerful Christian revivalist
movements created movements to missionize the world that had a horror of
having heathens on the continent.
These twin pathologies of racism and religious bigotry were implicated in a
whole series of white, Christian supremacist laws aimed at excluding whole
swathes of the world from immigration to the United States enacted between
1882 and 1924. Here are the highlights. Or, lowlights.
1. Chinese Buddhists Both racism and religious bigotry built up toward
Chinese-Americans brought in from 1849 to build the trans-American railroad.
In 1882, Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act, the first time a whole
people was excluded from the United States. In the prejudiced language of
the day, that Chinese were Buddhists, Confucianists or Taoists, i.e.
"pagans" or "heathens" from an Evangelical point of view, was one of the
reasons they should be kept out of the country. The total exclusion lasted
until 1943, when 100 Chinese a year began being admitted, which was not much
different from total exclusion. In 1965 the Immigration Act ended racial
and religious exclusions based on racism and religious fanaticism, including
of Chinese. Chinese-Americans have made enormous contributions to the
United States, despite the long decades during which they were excluded or
disrespected.
2. Japanese Buddhists. In 1907-08, the US and Japan concluded a "gentlemen's
agreement" whereby Japan would limit the number of passports it issued to
Japanese wanting to come to the United States. In turn, the city of San
Francisco agreed to end the legal segregation of Japanese-Americans in that
city (yes, they had their very own Jim Crow). Not satisfied with the
agreement, in 1924 racist Congressmen ended Japanese immigration completely.
This action angered Japan and set the two countries on a path of enmity.
3. Indian Hindus & Sikhs and other Asians. Not satisfied with measures
against Buddhists, white Christians next went after Hindus and Sikhs. The
1917 Asiatic Barred Zone Act excluded from immigration everyone from the
continent of Asia- it especially aimed at Indians, including especially
Sikhs, but also Koreans, Vietnamese, Thai, Indonesians, etc. etc. The
American Immigration Council writes:
"During the same period, Asian Indians, particularly Sikhs from the Punjabi
region who were originally brought by the British to work the
Canadian-Pacific railroads, began to move south into the U.S. Pacific
Northwest and California as farm workers. In response, nativist rioters
burnt out the Asian Indian settlements in Bellingham and Everett, Washington
in 1907. In the following decade, protectionist and racist groups,
epitomized by the Asian Exclusion League, campaigned against the "Hindu
invasion" or "Turban tide" that was perceived as an economic threat to
native farmers. Laws were passed in California to strip land ownership from
Asian Indians and Japanese in 1913 and 1920. In response, many Asian Indians
married Mexican-American women, which for a time exempted them from the law.
Asian Indian students who were supporters of independence from the British
Empire were expelled from the country by order of President Theodore
Roosevelt."
"Finally, sustained political attacks against Asian Indians such as those
orchestrated by Democratic Representative John Raker and immigration
commissioner Anthony Caminetti culminated in the imposition of the 1917
Barred Zone Act. Asian Indians joined other Asian country nationals (except
Japanese and Filipinos) who were excluded from immigrating to the United
States. The final injustice to Asian Indians was exacted by the U.S. Supreme
Court in the case of Bhagat Singh Thind (1923), which considered to which
race Asian Indians belonged. The Court decided that although Asian Indians
were Caucasian, they were not "white" and therefore could not be U.S.
citizens. Harassment of the Asian Indian population continued, forcing many
to return to India. By 1940 half of the Asian Indian population had left the
country, leaving only 2,405."
The provision in the act barring "polygamists" was aimed at Muslims.
Would-be Muslim immigrants were asked at their port of entry if they
believed a man could have more than one wife, and if they said yes, were
turned away.
Japanese were not part of the act only because the Gentlemen's Agreement
already mostly excluded them. Filipinos were not excluded because the
Philippines was then an American territory (i.e. colony).
4. Syrians-Lebanese. In the early 1920s, the Ku Klux Klan reappeared on the
national stage and agitated against immigrants, Catholics, and Jews. The
Klan infiltrated the Democratic Party and took it over, and won the whole
state of Indiana.
The racist 1924 Immigration act set country quotas based on the percentage
of Americans from that country already present in 1890. How exactly they
determined how many Americans were British, German, etc. is not clear to me.
But one consequence of basing the quotas on 1890 rather than, as was
originally proposed, 1910, was that populations that came in big numbers
during the Great Migration of 1880-1924 were often given low quotas.
Populations that came in the eighteenth century or the mid-19th (e.g. in the
latter case, Germans) had relatively large quotas. Syria-Lebanon (which
were not separated until the French conquest of 1920) were given a quota of
100, even though tens of thousands of Lebanese came to the United States,
10% of them Muslim during the Great Migration. That community produced the
great Lebanese-American writer and artist, Kahlil Gibran.
Now what we would call the Lebanese were excluded. In fact, some racists in
places like North Carolina argued that greater Syria was in West Asia and so
Lebanese/Syrians should be excluded on the basis of the Barred Asiatic Zone.
They put Lebanese Muslims and Christians into the category of the "Yellow
Peril"!
5. Other Middle Easterners, including Armenians. The 1924 Nazi-style quotas
based on "race," which mostly lasted until 1965, excluded most of the Middle
East. The quota for Egypt? 100. Palestine? 100. Turkey? 100. Even the
persecuted Armenians were given only 100 spaces annually.
The racial hierarchies visible in the 1924 act fed into an increasing
concern with eugenics, with fears of decadent races and a determination to
strengthen the master race by forbidding intermarriage and even by
experimenting on live human beings.
6. Jews. In the 1930s when it would have mattered, the US government
excluded Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany from coming to America. I wrote
elsewhere, "the US in the 1930s did betray its ideals as a refuge for people
yearning to be free. The episode of the SS St Louis, a ship full of 900
Jewish refugees that got close enough to Miami to see its lights before
being turned back to Europe, epitomized this failure. A third of the
passengers were later murdered by the Nazis. One Jewish refugee the US did
take in was Albert Einstein. How would we not have been better off if we'd
had more like him?"
Racists of that time argued that German Jews shouldn't be admitted because
Nazi agents might covertly exist among them.
Trump is proposing a 21st century version of the racist and religiously
bigoted Barred Asiatic Zone and its racist and bigoted successor, the 1924
Immigration Act. This is the new Ku Klux Klan, infiltrating the Republican
Party this time.
Those who have said they've never seen anything like it in American history
don't know their American history very well. The problem is not that what
Trump is saying is unprecedented. It is that it echoes the ugliest episodes
of American intolerance.
http://www.truthdig.com/ http://www.truthdig.com/
6 Times U.S. Government Excluded Millions Based on Race or Religion (Video)
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/top_6_times_us_government_excluded_milli
ons_race_religion_20151209/
Posted on Dec 9, 2015
By Juan Cole
This post originally ran on Truthdig contributor Juan Cole's website.
Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and other bigots on the far right are nothing new in
American history. Rather, they remind us of the worst and most shameful
detours of the American Republic in the past. From the mid-nineteenth
century racial theory became prominent in European and American discourse,
in which peoples were conceived of as endogamous (only marrying among
themselves and so producing 'pure' and 'less pure' 'races.') In contrast, in
the 18th century most Western thinkers believed the differences among
peoples had to do with climate and diet. The nineteenth century Romantic
notion of race is a fantasy-people get all mixed up over time.
But it would be a mistake to think race was the only consideration in
American xenophobia (hatred for foreigners). Powerful Christian revivalist
movements created movements to missionize the world that had a horror of
having heathens on the continent.
These twin pathologies of racism and religious bigotry were implicated in a
whole series of white, Christian supremacist laws aimed at excluding whole
swathes of the world from immigration to the United States enacted between
1882 and 1924. Here are the highlights. Or, lowlights.
1. Chinese Buddhists Both racism and religious bigotry built up toward
Chinese-Americans brought in from 1849 to build the trans-American railroad.
In 1882, Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act, the first time a whole
people was excluded from the United States. In the prejudiced language of
the day, that Chinese were Buddhists, Confucianists or Taoists, i.e.
"pagans" or "heathens" from an Evangelical point of view, was one of the
reasons they should be kept out of the country. The total exclusion lasted
until 1943, when 100 Chinese a year began being admitted, which was not much
different from total exclusion. In 1965 the Immigration Act ended racial and
religious exclusions based on racism and religious fanaticism, including of
Chinese. Chinese-Americans have made enormous contributions to the United
States, despite the long decades during which they were excluded or
disrespected.
2. Japanese Buddhists. In 1907-08, the US and Japan concluded a "gentlemen's
agreement" whereby Japan would limit the number of passports it issued to
Japanese wanting to come to the United States. In turn, the city of San
Francisco agreed to end the legal segregation of Japanese-Americans in that
city (yes, they had their very own Jim Crow). Not satisfied with the
agreement, in 1924 racist Congressmen ended Japanese immigration completely.
This action angered Japan and set the two countries on a path of enmity.
3. Indian Hindus & Sikhs and other Asians. Not satisfied with measures
against Buddhists, white Christians next went after Hindus and Sikhs. The
1917 Asiatic Barred Zone Act excluded from immigration everyone from the
continent of Asia- it especially aimed at Indians, including especially
Sikhs, but also Koreans, Vietnamese, Thai, Indonesians, etc. etc. The
American Immigration Council writes:
"During the same period, Asian Indians, particularly Sikhs from the Punjabi
region who were originally brought by the British to work the
Canadian-Pacific railroads, began to move south into the U.S. Pacific
Northwest and California as farm workers. In response, nativist rioters
burnt out the Asian Indian settlements in Bellingham and Everett, Washington
in 1907. In the following decade, protectionist and racist groups,
epitomized by the Asian Exclusion League, campaigned against the "Hindu
invasion" or "Turban tide" that was perceived as an economic threat to
native farmers. Laws were passed in California to strip land ownership from
Asian Indians and Japanese in 1913 and 1920. In response, many Asian Indians
married Mexican-American women, which for a time exempted them from the law.
Asian Indian students who were supporters of independence from the British
Empire were expelled from the country by order of President Theodore
Roosevelt."
"Finally, sustained political attacks against Asian Indians such as those
orchestrated by Democratic Representative John Raker and immigration
commissioner Anthony Caminetti culminated in the imposition of the 1917
Barred Zone Act. Asian Indians joined other Asian country nationals (except
Japanese and Filipinos) who were excluded from immigrating to the United
States. The final injustice to Asian Indians was exacted by the U.S. Supreme
Court in the case of Bhagat Singh Thind (1923), which considered to which
race Asian Indians belonged. The Court decided that although Asian Indians
were Caucasian, they were not "white" and therefore could not be U.S.
citizens. Harassment of the Asian Indian population continued, forcing many
to return to India. By 1940 half of the Asian Indian population had left the
country, leaving only 2,405."
The provision in the act barring "polygamists" was aimed at Muslims.
Would-be Muslim immigrants were asked at their port of entry if they
believed a man could have more than one wife, and if they said yes, were
turned away.
Japanese were not part of the act only because the Gentlemen's Agreement
already mostly excluded them. Filipinos were not excluded because the
Philippines was then an American territory (i.e. colony).
4. Syrians-Lebanese. In the early 1920s, the Ku Klux Klan reappeared on the
national stage and agitated against immigrants, Catholics, and Jews. The
Klan infiltrated the Democratic Party and took it over, and won the whole
state of Indiana.
The racist 1924 Immigration act set country quotas based on the percentage
of Americans from that country already present in 1890. How exactly they
determined how many Americans were British, German, etc. is not clear to me.
But one consequence of basing the quotas on 1890 rather than, as was
originally proposed, 1910, was that populations that came in big numbers
during the Great Migration of 1880-1924 were often given low quotas.
Populations that came in the eighteenth century or the mid-19th (e.g. in the
latter case, Germans) had relatively large quotas. Syria-Lebanon (which were
not separated until the French conquest of 1920) were given a quota of 100,
even though tens of thousands of Lebanese came to the United States, 10% of
them Muslim during the Great Migration. That community produced the great
Lebanese-American writer and artist, Kahlil Gibran.
Now what we would call the Lebanese were excluded. In fact, some racists in
places like North Carolina argued that greater Syria was in West Asia and so
Lebanese/Syrians should be excluded on the basis of the Barred Asiatic Zone.
They put Lebanese Muslims and Christians into the category of the "Yellow
Peril"!
5. Other Middle Easterners, including Armenians. The 1924 Nazi-style quotas
based on "race," which mostly lasted until 1965, excluded most of the Middle
East. The quota for Egypt? 100. Palestine? 100. Turkey? 100. Even the
persecuted Armenians were given only 100 spaces annually.
The racial hierarchies visible in the 1924 act fed into an increasing
concern with eugenics, with fears of decadent races and a determination to
strengthen the master race by forbidding intermarriage and even by
experimenting on live human beings.
6. Jews. In the 1930s when it would have mattered, the US government
excluded Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany from coming to America. I wrote
elsewhere, "the US in the 1930s did betray its ideals as a refuge for people
yearning to be free. The episode of the SS St Louis, a ship full of 900
Jewish refugees that got close enough to Miami to see its lights before
being turned back to Europe, epitomized this failure. A third of the
passengers were later murdered by the Nazis. One Jewish refugee the US did
take in was Albert Einstein. How would we not have been better off if we'd
had more like him?"
Racists of that time argued that German Jews shouldn't be admitted because
Nazi agents might covertly exist among them.
Trump is proposing a 21st century version of the racist and religiously
bigoted Barred Asiatic Zone and its racist and bigoted successor, the 1924
Immigration Act. This is the new Ku Klux Klan, infiltrating the Republican
Party this time.
Those who have said they've never seen anything like it in American history
don't know their American history very well. The problem is not that what
Trump is saying is unprecedented. It is that it echoes the ugliest episodes
of American intolerance.
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/washington_to_whomever_please_fight_isla
mic_state_for_us_20151210/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/washington_to_whomever_please_fight_isla
mic_state_for_us_20151210/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/washington_to_whomever_please_fight_isla
mic_state_for_us_20151210/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/like_many_americans_my_mom_has_no_retire
ment_savings_20151210/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/like_many_americans_my_mom_has_no_retire
ment_savings_20151210/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/like_many_americans_my_mom_has_no_retire
ment_savings_20151210/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/heat_saps_trees_beneficial_benefit_20151
210/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/heat_saps_trees_beneficial_benefit_20151
210/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/heat_saps_trees_beneficial_benefit_20151
210/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/its_time_to_fire_donald_trump_20151210/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/its_time_to_fire_donald_trump_20151210/
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/its_time_to_fire_donald_trump_20151210/
http://www.truthdig.com/ http://www.truthdig.com/
http://www.truthdig.com/about/http://www.truthdig.com/contact/http://www.tru
thdig.com/about/advertising/http://www.truthdig.com/user_agreement/http://ww
w.truthdig.com/privacy_policy/http://www.truthdig.com/about/comment_policy/
C 2015 Truthdig, LLC. All rights reserved.
http://www.hopstudios.com/
http://support.truthdig.com/signup_page/subscribe
http://support.truthdig.com/signup_page/subscribe
http://www.facebook.com/truthdighttp://twitter.com/intent/follow?source=foll
owbutton&variant=1.0&screen_name=truthdighttps://plus.google.com/+truthdight
tp://www.linkedin.com/company/truthdighttp://truthdig.tumblr.com/http://www.
truthdig.com/connect
