[blind-chess] Re: Revised Ladder
- From: Rebecca Redmile <amrywoddyddiauheulog@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: blind-chess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 17:36:55 +0100
Lord have mercy! Yes, it must have been that! It has its own internal logic,
Richard, it's just that you need a master's degree to understand it. Thanks for
clarifying. It's actually quite an ingenious notation system.
Rebecca
On 2010-05-08, at 5:31 PM, R Dinger wrote:
> Hi Rebecca,
>
> You are playing White.
>
> Why do you think you are not White?
>
> My ladder list is apparently confusing some of you. What can I do to make
> this clear? Oh, maybe in this case it is the "B" now after your name--that
> means your next challenge you will be Black. That changes every time you
> challenge and it is accepted.
>
> Richard
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Rebecca Redmile
> To: blind-chess@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2010 9:16 AM
> Subject: [blind-chess] Re: Revised Ladder
>
> I understood that I was playing white against Ginny. Sorry for all my
> confusion.
> Rebecca
>
> On 2010-05-08, at 5:11 PM, R Dinger wrote:
>
>> Current Ladder Ordering and Player Status:
>>
>> Rank Name (color for next challenge)
>> 1 Shane Wegner (W) defending Maynard
>> 2 Allen Maynard (B) challenging Wegner May 1
>> 3 Lewis Wallach (B)
>> 4 Carol Harvester (W) defending Blazik
>> 5 Alvin Blazik (B) challenging Harvester May 4
>> 6 Jim Homme (W) defending Gieschen
>> 7 Mike Gieschen (B) challenging Homme May 1
>> 8 Chris Chaffin (B)
>> 9 Hugh Pharis (W)
>> 10 Randy Kruzeniski (B)
>> 11 Connie Torrisi (W)
>> 12. Ginny Alverson (W) defending Redmile
>> 13. Rebecca Redmile (B) challenging Alverson May 8
>> 14. Lis Geoghegan (W)
>
>
Other related posts:
