Annotated Game #003: Louis de La Bourdonnais - Alexander McDonnell, London 1834 Adapted and Condensed from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Contents: ++1. Louis-Charles Mahi de La Bourdonnais ++1/A Early life ++1.B Unofficial World Chess Champion ++1.C Death ++2. Alexander McDonnell ++2.A Early life ++2.B Matches with La Bourdonnais ++2.C Death ++3. La Bourdonnais - McDonnell chess matches ++3.A Background ++3.B La Bourdonnais and McDonnell matches ++3.C The 50th Game ++1. Louis-Charles Mahi de La Bourdonnais World Champion: 1821-1840 (Unofficial) Louis-Charles Mahi de La Bourdonnais (1795-1840) was a French chess master, possibly the strongest player in the early 19th century. ++1/A Early life La Bourdonnais was born on the island of La Riunion in the Indian Ocean in 1797. He learned chess in 1814 and began to take the game seriously in 1818, when he regularly played at the Cafe de la Rigence. He took lessons from Jacques Frangois Mouret, his first teacher, and within two years he became one of the best players of the Cafi. La Bourdonnais was forced to earn his living as a professional chess player after squandering his fortune on ill-advised land deals. ++1.B Unofficial World Chess Champion La Bourdonnais was considered to be the unofficial World Chess Champion (there was no official title at the time) from 1821, when he became able to beat his chess teacher Alexandre Deschapelles, until his death in 1840. The most famous match series, indeed considered as the world championship, was the one against Alexander McDonnell in 1834. ++1.C Death He died penniless in London in 1840, having been forced to sell all of his possessions, including his clothes, to satisfy his creditors. George Walker arranged to have him buried just a stone's throw away from his old rival Alexander McDonnell in London's Kensal Green Cemetery. He was the grandson of Bertrand-Frangois Mahi de La Bourdonnais. ++2. Alexander McDonnell Alexander McDonnell (1798-1835) was an Irish chess master, who contested a series of six matches with the world's leading player Louis-Charles Mahi de La Bourdonnais in the summer of 1834. ++2. Alexander McDonnell ++2.A Early life The son of a surgeon, Alexander McDonnell was born in Belfast in 1798. He was trained as a merchant and worked for some time in the West Indies. In 1820 he settled in London, where he became the secretary of the Committee of West Indian Merchants. It was a lucrative post that made him a wealthy man and left him with plenty of time to indulge his passion for chess. In 1825 he became a pupil of William Lewis, who was then the leading player in Britain. But soon McDonnell had become so good that Lewis, fearing for his reputation, simply refused to play him anymore. ++2.B Matches with La Bourdonnais At that time the world's strongest player was the French aristocrat Louis-Charles Mahi de La Bourdonnais. Between June and October 1834 La Bourdonnais and McDonnell played a series of six matches, a total of eighty-five games, at the Westminster Chess Club in London. McDonnell won the second match, while La Bourdonnais won first, third, fourth, and fifth. The sixth match was unfinished. ++2.C Death McDonnell was suffering from Bright's disease, a historical classification of nephritis, which affects the kidneys. In the summer of 1835 his condition worsened and he died in London on 15 September 1835 before his match with La Bourdonnais could be resumed. When La Bourdonnais died penniless in 1840, George Walker arranged to have him buried in London's Kensal Green Cemetery, near where his old rival McDonnell is buried. ++3. La Bourdonnais - McDonnell chess matches The La Bourdonnais - McDonnell chess matches were a series of chess matches in 1834 between Louis-Charles Mahi de La Bourdonnais of France and Alexander McDonnell of Ireland. These matches confirmed La Bourdonnais as the leading chess player in the world. They are sometimes seen as having been unofficial World Chess Championship matches, before the title of World Chess Champion existed. It was the first match of importance in the history of chess and is sometimes referred to today as the World Championship of 1834. The games were published widely, and were annotated and discussed by enthusiasts all over Europe. In the course of the mammoth encounter, both players introduced several innovations, a few of which are still seen today. It might even be said that the modern era of chess began with the McDonnell-La Bourdonnais match of 1834. La Bourdonnais won the first, third, fourth and fifth matches; McDonnell won the second match, and the sixth was abandoned with McDonnell leading. The overall score was 45 wins to La Bourdonnais, 27 wins to McDonnell, and 13 draws. ++3.A Background De La Bourdonnais was considered the world's leading player from 1821, when he surpassed his mentor Alexandre Deschapelles. In 1823 La Bourdonnais defeated William Lewis, Britain's leading player, in a match in London, and in the spring of 1825 he played and defeated the best players that England had to offer. Nine years later he returned to London when a challenge was issued on McDonnell's behalf. ++3.B La Bourdonnais and McDonnell matches Match summary: Match #1: La Bourdonnais won 16 drew 4 lost 5 Match won by La Bourdonnais 18-7 Match #2: La Bourdonnais won 4 drew 0 lost 5 Match won by McDonnell 5-4 Match #3: La Bourdonnais won 6 drew 1 lost 5 Match won by La Bourdonnais 6.5-5.5 Match #4: La Bourdonnais won 8 drew 7 lost 3 Match won by La Bourdonnais 11.5-6.5 Match #5: La Bourdonnais won 7 drew 1 lost 4 Match won by La Bourdonnais 7.5-4.5 Match #6: La Bourdonnais won 4 Drew 0 lost 5 Match unfinished with McDonnell leading 5-4 Total: La Bourdonnais won 45 McDonnell won 27 There were 13 draws Between June and October 1834 La Bourdonnais and McDonnell played a series of six matches, a total of eighty-five games, at the Westminster Chess Club in London. The games were recorded for posterity by the club's elderly founder William Greenwood Walker, who remained by McDonnell's side for almost the entire duration of the match. Play generally began around noon, some of the games taking more than seven hours to complete. La Bourdonnais knew no English and McDonnell knew no French. It is said that the only word they exchanged during their historic encounter was "check!" After each game, McDonnell would return to his room exhausted, where he would spend hours pacing back and forth in a state of nervous agitation. Meanwhile La Bourdonnais would be downstairs regaling himself at the chessboard. He would continue to play till long after midnight, smoking cigars, drinking punch and gambling. One night he reportedly played forty games before going to bed, even though he had to face McDonnell the following morning. McDonnell and La Bourdonnais were evenly matched in their abilities across the board, but wildly contrasted in their styles of play. The Frenchman was renowned for the rapidity of his play, often replying to his opponent's moves within seconds, whereas the Irishman sometimes took as many as two hours to make a single move. But despite his deliberation, McDonnell was a reckless player. Where the Frenchman preferred to err on the side of caution, the Irishman could not resist embarking on wild and often ill- considered attacks, something which told against him during their encounter. The characters of the two men were also very different. La Bourdonnais was an ebullient and garrulous individual. When winning, he grew talkative and affable; but when things went against him, he "swore tolerably round oaths in a pretty audible voice", as Walker recorded. McDonnell on the other hand was observed to be taciturn and imperturbable. Winning or losing, he betrayed little emotion at the table, a habit which seemingly unnerved his explosive opponent. In the first match of the series McDonnell's lack of big-match experience told against him and he was heavily defeated by sixteen games to five, with four draws (+5 -16 =4). But he quickly recovered from this setback and went on to win the second match by five games to four (+5 -4). Although the title of World Chess Champion was not created until 1886 (with Wilhelm Steinitz as the first champion), the world's leading players from earlier times are recognized today as unofficial world champions. La Bourdonnais is usually regarded as the champion from 1821 until his death in 1840. It is often said that he defeated McDonnell in their mammoth encounter in 1834. But the 1834 World Championship was not one match: it was a series of six matches, the second of which was won by McDonnell. It could be argued that McDonnell ought to be recognized as the unofficial world champion for the brief period between the second and third matches of his series with La Bourdonnais. La Bourdonnais won the third match, by a score of +6 -5 =1. He also won the fourth and fifth matches +8 -3 and +7 -4 respectively. The final match was abandoned in obscure circumstances. Apparently La Bourdonnais was forced to return to France to deal with his creditors. McDonnell was leading +5 -4 at the time. It seems the players had a loose agreement to continue the match at a later date. Another story suggests that La Bourdonnais gave McDonnell odds of a three-game lead, with the first player to reach eight victories being declared the winner, but this is unlikely and impossible to confirm. Harry Golombek evaluated the games and found them to generally be of low quality. There were some instances of brilliance, but the level of technique, especially in the endgame was low. In one game McDonnell had an endgame with a rook and two pawns versus a rook and did not know how to win. He lost his rook due to a blunder and lost the game. La Bourdonnais was not as bad as McDonnell in the endgame but he was weak in the opening. The games lacked any cohesive strategy. There were relatively few draws, but this was partly due to MdDonnell's inaccurate defense, which caused him to lose games instead of draw them. ++3.C The 50th Game McDonnell-Labourdonais match #4, Round 50, London 1834 White: Louis De Labourdonnais Black: Alexander McDonnell Result: 0-1 ECO: D20 - Queen's Gambit Accepted, Saduleto Variation (Notes by R.J. Macdonald. Additional notes from an unknown source.) Still one of the most exciting chess games ever played. McDonnell sacrifices a queen for two minor pieces and a very strong position. This is an excellent example of a positional queen sacrifice. Queen sacrifices are rarely made unless they win immediately. 1. d4 d5 2. c4 (The Queen's Gambit.) 2. ... dxc4 (Accepted. Black does not expect to hold on to the extra pawn.) 3. e4 (Trying to control the center and planning 4. Bxc4. Nowadays 3. Nf3 is preferred to prevent Black's next move.) 3. ... e5 (After 4. dxe5 Qxd1+ 5. Kxd1 Be6 the position is even.) 4. d5 f5 (Attacking the base of the pawn chain. A side pawn is usually less important than a center pawn.) 5. Nc3 (If now 5. ... fxe4? then 6. Qh5+ and after either 6. ... g6 or 6. ... Ke7 White plays Qxe5+ with a winning position.) 5. ... Nf6 6. Bxc4 (regaining the gambit pawn.) 6. ... Bc5 (The bishop is more aggressively placed here than on d6.) 7. Nf3 (Developing the knight and threatening the e pawn.) 7. ... Qe7 (guarding the pawn.) 8. Bg5 (This is eventually shown to be a mistake, but it is not a blunder; it is a deliberate pawn sacrifice.) 8. ... Bxf2+ (If 9. Kxf2 then 9. ... fxe4 10. Bxf6 (Not 10. Nxe4 Nxe4+) 10. ... Qc5+ 11. Ke1 exf3 12. Bb5+ c6 13. Qxf3 (Not 13. Bxg7 Qe3+) gxf6 wins back the piece with a good game for Black.) 9. Kf1 Bb6 10. Qe2 (Although White has lost the right to castle, all of his pieces are active except his shut-in rook on h1. White is threatening to win his pawn back by 11. exf5 Bxf5 Nxe5. If Black plays 10. ... fxe4 then after 11. Nxe4 the threat of 12. Nxf6 breaking up Black's kingside is difficult to cope with. ) 10. ... f4 11. Rd1 (Bringing the rook to an active central position.) 11. ... Bg4 (Pinning White's knight.) 12. d6 (To make room for the knight on d5.) 12. ... cxd6 13. Nd5 (If 13. ... Qd8 then 14. Nxf4 exf4 15. e5 winning back the knight with a crushing attack.) 13. ... Nxd5!! (A striking conception. Black's two minor pieces will be more powerful than White's queen.) 14. Bxe7 Ne3+ 15. Ke1 (In retrospect, it might have been better to give back the queen with 15. Qxe3 although Black would have ended up a pawn ahead.) 15. ... Kxe7 16. Qd3 (Breaking the pin on the knight and threatening 17. Qxd6.) 16. ... Rd8 (Guarding the d pawn. Black has no desire to trade his wonderful knight on e3 for the rook on d1.) 17. Rd2 (Guards the pawn on g2.) 17. ... Nc6 18. b3 Ba5 (Pinning the rook.) 19. a3 Rac8 (Bringing his only undeveloped piece into action. If 20. b4 then 20. ... Nxb4 21. axb4 Bxb4 22. Ba2 Bxf3 23. gxf3 Rc2 threatening 24. ... Rxd2 and 24. ... Rxa2.) 20. Rg1 b5 (Black now gains an advantage in material as well as position.) 21. Bxb5 Bxf3 (If 22. Bxc6 then 22. ... Rxc6 23. gxf3 Rc1+ 24. Kf2 Bxd2 25. Qxd2 Rc2 wins.) 22. gxf3 Nd4 (If 23. Kf2 then 23. ... Bxd2 and White cannot play 24. Qxd2 because of 24. ... Rc2 winning the queen.) 23. Bc4 (Attempting to block the entrance of the Black rook.) 23. ... Nxf3+ 24. Kf2 Nxd2 25. Rxg7+ (Black must play carefully here.) 25. ... Kf6 26. Rf7+ Kg6 27. Rb7 Ndxc4 28. bxc4 Rxc4 29. Qb1 (Threatening Qg1+ with a mating attack.) 29. ... Bb6 (Threatening to move the knight on e3 with discovered check. If 30. Qg1+ then 31. ... Ng4+ winning the queen.) 30. Kf3 (White is again threatening Qg1+.) 30. ... Rc3! (Now if 31. Qg1+ then 31. ... Ng4+ 32. Kxg4 Bxg1.) 31. Qa2 (Threatening Qf7+.) 31. ... Nc4+ (Cutting off the queen.) 32. Kg4 Rg8 (Threatening 33. ... Kh6+ (with the rook) 34. Kh4 Bd8+ and Mate. (next move. Also possible was 33. ... h5+ 34. Kh4 Bd8# Paul Benson.)) 33. Rxb6 axb6 34. Kh4 Kf6 35. Qe2 Rg6 36. Qh5 Ne3 0-1 (In view of 37. Qxh7 Ng2+ 38. Kh5 Rh3#)========== The blind-chess mailing list View list information and change your settings: //www.freelists.org/list/blind-chess List archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/blind-chess =========