Thanks,
I shall do it in rtf. As far as rejections I discarded all of them
already. I suppose I shouldn't have been so hasty. It just seemed that
there was about ten of them within a couple weeks. I must confess I didn't
look on the list to see if maybe they were already there. Anyway, I read
the books for moyself, but it would be nice if I could pass them along for
others to read. I'll check into them more in the future before I develop a
complex.
Thanks again.
Bud
At 06:59 PM 5/15/2004, you wrote:
Hi Bud, Ok, the short version is that rtf is better. <grin> More people can validate them, they are smaller files, and they retain formatting. Of course there's nothing wrong with submitting in .kes, but it will take longer to get the book validated because fewer people can manage kes files.
About rejections, if you want to know why specific books got rejected you can write to the Bookshare staff and ask. In fact, if you can't think of any reason why the book would have been rejected I recommend asking; that way you can figure out if there's anything you can do to make things go more smoothly. Hth, Kellie
