[bksvol-discuss] Re: recommendations?
- From: "Terra Syslo" <tlsyslo@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:09:15 -0500
Thanks. Are you using Openbook as well? I'm pretty sure the Pearl is the
source of the problem, but I'm wondering if Kurzweil has better results than
Openbook.
From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Valerie Maples
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 1:04 AM
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: recommendations?
Nothing beats the OpticBook 3600, in my experience. I work with many very
old books with fragile spines and they all come through without a problem!
Valerie
On Sep 29, 2010, at 11:24 PM, Terra Syslo wrote:
Since I am getting terrible results with the Pearl, does anyone have any
recommendations for scanners that are fast and yet more accurate? Someone
mentioned the Plustek Opticbook, but are there other recommendations anyone
can give me? I want to be able to scan paperbacks without destroying the
spines of the books, since I get them right now from the library.
Other related posts:
