Hi, Cindy. I thought you were talking about something you'd validated, not something you were submitting as a replacement for something already in the collection. If I confused that, I'll shut up now. *smile* Take care. Julie Morales Email and Windows/MSN Messenger: inlovewithchrist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx If your dog is fat, you aren't getting enough exercise. --Unknown The reason a dog has so many friends is that he wags his tail instead of his tongue. --Anonymous ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cindy R" <popularplace@xxxxxxxxx> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 12:58 PM Subject: [bksvol-discuss] credit taken away? Julia, I don't really know the answer to your question. But I think posted here was the answer to a somewhat different question: If I remember correctly, if a book is rejected, the submitter doesn't get the credit. But in the case of a replacement being submitted, at least after the book as been added to the collection and errors were found by a member who downloaded it from the collection, I would think that the submitter has already received credit for the submission and it would be difficult if not impossible to take it away. Where a download-for-validation book is submitted as a replacement just because the format has changed, I would not think the submitter would lose the credit, but I don't know. There wouldn't be any reason, because the original submitter is still the one that did the scanning - all the replacement submitter did was validate it. Administrators? Can you clarify? Cindy Hi, Cindy. I don't know if anyone has asked this before, but in the case where you resubmit a book in RTF, doesn't that take away the credit from the person who had originally submitted it? I know the RTF keeps the format, but I don't know. I'm just curious. Take care. Julie Morales __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/