I'm in agreement with David Roemer about the ID of the male scaup in our last photo quiz, although I'm not *positive* that the bird can be unequivocally identified in the photo. Regarding the head shape, I had thought not necessarily the slope of the back of the crown, but more the overall bulk of the head and bill looked good for Greater, but the head shape in David's Lesser Scaup photos on the KOS web site certainly look similar overall. Also, the wing pattern certainly looks more like Lesser when compared to David's photos; in particular, the view of the far wing from the *underside* on the lower (second) photo does not show the translucence that it would seem should be there in the inner primaries to be a Greater wing pattern. I had convinced myself that the inner primaries were *light enough* to suggest it was more like Greater than Lesser, and while even some wing pattern variation is apparent in David's scaup flight photos, the pattern of the bird in question is much closer to Lesser than Greater using those photos. I might add one note concerning my perpetual state of frustration with scaup wing patterns, that being that I have always and still to this day find the scaup "wing-stripe" difference to be a *very* difficult field mark to assess. I don't know how fast the beating outer wing of a scaup is moving in flight, but the blur that any scaup wing becomes to the visible eye in the field is certainly extreme! Only when loafing birds have stretched a wing or flapped more slowly after bathing have I ever thought I was properly perceiving the wing stripe pattern. In-flight photos afford a unique opportunity to see something that is actually seen clearly in the field only on rare occasions. Also, if anyone has back issues of The Kentucky Warbler, more than 40 years ago KOS member, Haven Wiley, discussed the differences between Greater and Lesser scaup (at a time when there were few records of Greaters) in an interesting article entitled "Appraisal of Greater Scaup Sight Records at Louisville" in Vol. 41 (1965), pp. 35-40. So thanks to Rick Seelhorst for submitting the photos and David Roemer for submitting the final word (unless anyone else cares to disagree with the consensus!) on this quiz. bpb, Frankfort