[birdky] Discovery about Pine versus Worm-Eating Warbler trills
- From: Ben Albritton <benalbritton@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: birdky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 06:12:18 -0800 (PST)
I have started going over warbler vocalizations every night getting in shape
for spring warblers! and wanted to share with any other birding by ear
enthusiast a discovery I think I have found on distinguishing the pine
warbler's dry trill (not the musical loose notes) from the worm-eating
warbler's trill. I have four auditory sources independent of each other, and
whenever I came up with a theory about note rapidity, tone or pitch variations
or volume distributions within the vocalization, as soon as I checked with
another of my sources my theory would be blown out of the water. But finally I
found something quite simple which was consistently true across all of my
independent sources. And that is just the duration of the trill. Counting the
beats out in time, the pine warbler's trill is three-quarters that of the worm
eating warbler's in duration. This quarter of duration difference can actually
be very well felt. It is musically significant enough to be a definite
handle if it continues to prove true. I plan to get my hands on a few more
sources and test it further. By the way I haven't seen this said anywhere in
literature so if I am reinventing a wheel here, please pardon my ignorance!
Best birding wishes,
Ben Albritton
Lexington, KY
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
Other related posts:
- » [birdky] Discovery about Pine versus Worm-Eating Warbler trills
