Hi. The vibration suppression pads are a big help for the 8se due to the small tripod. Without the pads, it is very sensitive when focusing. Howard On Saturday, February 28, 2015, David M. Douglass < dmdouglass@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, the mount would be the same for the 6se or the 8se. It is the > standard > Nexstar mount. > "Frail" tripod ?? Well, the se mount is an Alt/Az mount. Thus, probably > mostly visual use, and probably no "add-ons", so..... not so bad. > The 6se lists for $800, and the 8se lists for $1,200. > > Is your "friend" new into this hobby ?? > The thing that comes to mind is the focual lengh and field of view. > The 8se is a 2032 mm f/l, and thus the normal 8" SCT high magnification and > smaller field of view. King of tough on a newer user. > The 6se at 1500 mm f/l, gives a slightly broader field of view for the same > eyepiece. Might by easier on the newer user. > > There you go, you got my 2cents worth !! > > David M. Douglass > dmdouglass@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;> (secondary) > david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;> (main) > Cell (602) 908-9092 > > -----Original Message----- > From: az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;> > [mailto:az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of > Stan Gorodenski > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 3:23 PM > To: Az-Observing > Subject: [AZ-Observing] Nexstar > > A friend is considering buying a Nexstar 6se. I think he should get the > 8se. > What do you all think about the 6se? Good telescope, bad? The Tripod seems > sort of frail. Is it a problem? > Stan > > -- > See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please > send personal replies to the author, not the list. > > > -- > See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please > send personal replies to the author, not the list. > > -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.