Chris, as usual, a fine image. I've got an observation from 10 Aug 2002 from Cherry Rd of both objects (Saw them in the same field). This was in an *" f/6 Dob at 72x. I'd give the night a 6 for see & 7 for Transparency. My Observations below: IC 1295: Noted in same field as NGC 6712. Very small stellarlike, would not have seen it if not for obvious field stars pointing at it. Using the O-III it is barely visible although obvious from the blue color. NGC 6712: Noted in same field as IC 1295. Seen as mottled haze about 2' in size. Brighter toward the middle and slightly elongated about 1.1-1 E-W. Clear Skies Rick Tejera President, Editor SACnews Saguaro Astronomy Club Phoenix, Arizona www.saguaroastro.org saguaroastro@xxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Schur Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 19:39 To: Az-Observing List; Mike Bakich Astronomy; Steve Coe; EVAC list; Stuart Heggie; Jerry Bonnell APOD); Albert Levy; Thelma/John Ofarrell; ARTHUR PICCINATI; Robert Nemiroff APOD; Lon Shelton; Serge Theberge; Paul Tierney; Vince; Peter Wehinger Subject: [AZ-Observing] Globular NGC6712 and Planetary IC1295 in Scutum Now heres one I can assure you will be a visual challenge object even in a large dobsonian. A huge 90 arc second planetary, 15th magnitude less than a degree away from a brilliant globular cluster! And photographically it is a gorgeous cornflower blue color. Check this out: http://www.schursastrophotography.com/ccdimagepages/ngc6712.html Any observations or comments on this one? Chris ____________________________________________________________________________ ________ Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more. http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list. -- See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please send personal replies to the author, not the list.