Well boys. It might just be as simple as changing your viewing habits. ;-) (It was Friday yesterday.) http://www.naturalnews.com/027364_internet_pandemic_traffic.html From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brian Clarke Sent: Saturday, 31 October 2009 11:54 AM To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: atw: Re: First impressions of Google Wave? Hello Geoffrey, There is no simple way to answer your question. The nearest anyone could get would be to ask all the electricity distribution authorities, because people setting up server farms almost always ask for specially conditioned mains supply. Then perhaps, under the Freedom of Information Act, you could ask to see the electricity consumption details going back to year dot. That would give you a gross consumption figure. How anyone would tease out what electricity consumption is economically valuable from what is purely entertaining to people who have too much time and too little intelligence would require a crystal ball of as yet unknown dimensions. And how do you measure the economic value of porn and paedophilia sites? As an electrical engineer, I am appalled by the amount of energy wasted in leaving heating, lighting and ventilation [HLV] on in office blocks when there is no-one around except the security and janitorial staff. I suspect the amount of un-needed HLV consumption probably exceeds that used in supporting all server farms, of any colour. On each floor of a building, a simple PIR detector could assess whether there was any warm body and whether that warm body was moving as the basis for turning the HLV off or at least to a hibernation level. Use a minimum energy threshold, say 75 W, and a 5-s pulse to avoid nuisance power surges as the mice come out to play. The same kind of sensing could be used for cutting down power consumption in central servers; eg, after say 1900 hours, turn off or hibernate all servers that have not received a data request for 5 s. Perhaps add intelligent key word querying to determine whether each query is economically valuable or mere trivia - like Facebook, spam, twotter or journalistic hacking. Agreed that the electronic media have been hijacked by stuff close to faecal value. Still, there are probably some lonely people out there whom religion no longer opiates. Who is to decide whether economics is the new religion of choice for the masses? I have used 'economics' as an Aunt Sally throughout - you could substitute art, literature, sport, cinema ... and get the same argument. Cheers, Brian.