I am a member of the WORD-PC list. The following very interesting post = came through this morning. I am only forwarding this to Austechwriter as I know that it has been discussed many times. I haven't contributed to this thread on WORD-PC, = so don't shoot the messenger! Debbie -----Original Message----- From: Julie Brazier [mailto:Julie.Brazier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]=20 Sent: Tuesday, 4 November 2003 8:46=20 To: WORD-PC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Word 2002 - upgrade or abandon? Hi Tony We've been dealing with Microsoft quite extensively on this topic and = have learned a lot about the char problem. In summary: 1. Deliberate char functionality Char styles are created when a style is applied to a section of a = paragraph. It is Microsoft's way of making a paragraph style behave as a character style and these styles are supposed to be hidden from the user. 2. Bug v. deliberate char style behaviour As a rule of thumb, any style with more than one char appended or with = char and a number, e.g. char1, is a bug Any char style that displays in the Styles and Formatting Task Pane is a = bug Any instance where the char style replaces the original parent style = thus becoming a paragraph style in its own right e.g. new 'DocTxt Char' style replacing DocTxt. 3. Combatting the bug A post-SP2 patch has been released by Microsoft to their Premier clients which stops the behaviour noted above. This would definitely be = included in SP3 but we have no idea if / when this would be available to the general public as a separate patch. 4. Fixing documents with the problem The official line from Microsoft is that Char styles should not be = deleted. We have tried removing them and have seen variable results. This is especially true when using a complex style hierarchy. Renaming them is = not the answer but we're still working on a solution here as we are seeing = them have a major impact when they appear in our documents. For the moment = we would just recommend using a Find and Replace to replace all instances = of Char styles with their proper styles, then ignore remaining char styles = in the Styles list. Hope that helps! Julie -----Original Message----- From: Tony Chu [mailto:tonychu72@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 12:24 AM To: WORD-PC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Word 2002 - upgrade or abandon? (message resent with non-blank subject field) Keith - that's very interesting. At least I know I'm not going nuts. Do you recall the circumstances under which this problem appeared - only when deleting a Char style? or trying to replace it with another style? = no problems when working with regular styles (paragraph or character but = not both)? I'm going to look this up in the Microsoft support site - has anyone = else heard of this? Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 11:08:39 -0500 From: Keith Soltys <Keith.Soltys@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Word 2002 - upgrade or abandon? I ran into the problem where removing the Char styles deleted the text. Unreal. I've also run into a problem where Word refuses to delete the style. I think the problem still exists in SP-2 although it may not be as rampant. In my case, I've gone to Adobe FrameMaker for big projects, which is what I should have been using in the first place. Keith -- Keith Soltys Technical Writer, Quality Assurance TSX Technologies keith.soltys@xxxxxxx (416) 947-4397 Hello all. I need some advise re Word 2002 (basic - not SP1 or SP2). I'm getting quite frustrated with it. And I'm wondering whether I need to go forward to SP1 or SP2, or maybe I'd be better off going back to Word 2000 which seemed more reliable. Please bear with me while I explain. I've written to this group before and read a lot of useful postings about "Char" styles and I've been systematically trying to get rid of them when they occur. Although I must say they haven't been giving me any real trouble, and I've been wondering whether I should just give up and leave them. But yesterday Word did something wacky to me. I have a basic paragraph style called "docpara", but of course I found an old doc that had "docpara char". So I was painstakingly finding each instance of this, looking at what it was, and converting it manually to "docpara". But when I finished and saved the doc, the docpara paragraphs had disappeared on several pages. Not just the formatting - the actual content. Gone. Vanished. And on some other pages, the text had a completely different format (very small font)! Now, I can't figure out what I could have been doing that would have deleted the entire paragraph(s). I was using the style pane, and right clicking on docpara char to get the next instance, highlighting it in the doc, and then clicking on "docpara" to convert it...and checking in "docpara char" to see that the number of instances had decreased. Seemed easy. So now I'm wondering if 2002 is just too buggy. My questions: 1. Has anyone ever had this happen to them and know why? 2. I remember reading somewhere in a posting that 2002 SP2 "gets rid of Char" styles. Is that right? What actually happens to a doc that has Char styles when you open it in SP2? 3. Has anyone worked with 2002, ended up with Char styles, and then abandoned 2002 and gone back to 2000? What happens to the Char styles? My guess is they are still there, still called "Char", but probably marked as Paragraph or Character but not both. i.e. maybe more reliable and easier to fix or live with??? Help. Thank you Tony Chu. P.S. AAAAARGH =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D This email is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not = the intended recipient please notify us immediately by telephoning +44 (20) = 7330 3000 and requesting the IT Helpdesk. You should not copy it or use it = for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person. Allen & Overy One New Change London EC4M 9QQ Tel:+44 (20) 7330 3000 Fax: +44 (20) 7330 9999 General Email: Helpdesk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx www: http://www.allenovery.com Allen & Overy is a solicitors' partnership. A list of the names of = partners and their professional qualifications is open to inspection at the above office. The partners are either solicitors or registered foreign = lawyers. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This is a legal communication not a financial communication. Neither = this nor any other communication from this firm is intended to be, or should = be construed as, an invitation or inducement (direct or indirect) to any = person to engage in investment activity. The following information is provided = in accordance with the Solicitors' Financial Services (Conduct of Business) Rules 2001. The provision of our legal services may relate to = investments. We are not authorised by the Financial Services Authority, but we are regulated by the Law Society and we can undertake certain activities in relation to investments which are limited in scope and incidental to our legal services or which may reasonably be regarded as a necessary part = of our legal services. If for any reason we are unable to resolve a problem = between us and a client, our client may utilise the complaints and redress = scheme operated by the Law Society. -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---- ------- ************************************************** To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field. To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the Subject field. To search the austechwriter archives, go to www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter To contact the list administrator, send a message to austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx **************************************************