Article in yesterday's Age about the UK govt discovering that it's not a good idea to put a Word document up onto a website... http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/07/02/1056825430340.html .... and I'll bet the "small program" he used was a couple of lines of VBA... Actually, I'll include the text below for those who don't have access: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D UK government gets bitten by Microsoft Word By Sam Varghese July 2 2003 The British government is unlikely to use Microsoft Word for creating official documents which are to be released publicly, after the authors of the controversial dossier put out by Britain in February this year were identified by examining the information contained in a Word version of the file.=20 IT researcher Richard M. Smith downloaded the dossier - which was put on the web in both Word and PDF format - and decided to try and find out the authors.=20 Smith wrote a small program to retrieve the revision logs and found four names and information regarding who had revised the file and in which order it was revised. He was also able to spot the point at which the file was copied to a floppy.=20 During the inquiry in the last week of June into efforts to drum up support for the war, Alastair Campbell of the UK Communications Information Centre had to explain the dossier plagiarism and details of the revision log.=20 The dossier, which was also cited by US Secretary of State Colin Powell in an address to the United Nations, earned the government and Prime Minister Tony Blair plenty of flak after Cambridge University politics lecturer Dr Glen Rangwala noticed that a portion had been plagiarised from a 10-year-old US research paper.=20 Smith's analysis showed a reference to cic22 which he deduced as being the Communications Information Centre.=20 From there on, it was easy to identify the authors and their positions in government ranks by reverting to Dr Rangwala and British journalists. The Word version of the document has now been removed from the British government site.=20 This is not the first time that public use of Word documents has led to red faces. Criminals have been caught because they used Office. Companies in negotiations have been stunned to find their opponents seemed to have insider knowledge and public officials have been embarrassed when early "unrefined" versions of their statements have been published in detail. ********** CAUTION - Disclaimer ********** This message may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person) you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, you should destroy it and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet e-mail for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Expert Information Services Pty Ltd ("The Company") shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. The Company advises that this e-mail and any attached files should be scanned to detect viruses. The Company accepts no liability for loss or damage (whether caused by negligence or not) resulting from the use of any attached files. **EIS******** End of Disclaimer ********** ************************************************** To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field. To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the Subject field. To search the austechwriter archives, go to www.freelist.org/archives/austechwriter To contact the list administrator, send a message to austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx **************************************************