[audacity4blind] Re: doubling voices

  • From: Brad Erhardt <brad.erhardt@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: audacity4blind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 15:09:59 -0800

Hi Thanks Richard, I tried this and this seems to be working very well. 
Brad 
On 2014-02-15, at 4:31 AM, Rich De Steno wrote:

> You cannot exactly simulate two separate performances of the singing, but you 
> can offset a second copy of the original vocal.  After you make the copy, 
> select the copy and make sure that the original vocal track and all other 
> tracks are not selected.  Press control F6 and tab over until you get to the 
> select spin boxes.  Right arrow over to milliseconds and increase the value 
> by ten or twenty milliseconds.  Press F6 twice to get back to the tracks 
> window.  Then press alt-t followed by a and c to align the second voice track 
> with the time you just set.  This produces a fuller singing sound.  You can 
> vary the times you set in the spin box.  However, this is not the same sound 
> as if you sang over yourself in a new track.  That produces a different 
> effect.  You also might consider putting reverb on the second vocal track 
> above but not on the first.  This produces the reverb sound without that 
> distant sound that reverb brings.
> 
> Rich De Steno
> On 2/14/2014 9:28 PM, Brad Erhardt wrote:
>> Has anyone discovered how to edit sounds so that you get a doubled voice 
>> like they used to do in old music. They used to have a singer record 
>> themselves and then sing back to the recording while recording again. here 
>> is a link to the lady who first made this famous, Patty Page. 
>> 
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHRpbiG_ruk
>> 
>> I have two tracks open, both with the same song clip. When you play them 
>> simultaneously they sound no different. I think the key might be introducing 
>> a small gap by perhaps inserting         silence at the beginning of the 
>> second track. I have tried this though and I haven't yet been successful.
>> 
>> If anyone has any ideas, please let me know.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Brad Erhardt
>> brad.erhardt@xxxxxxxxx
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

Brad Erhardt
brad.erhardt@xxxxxxxxx



Other related posts: