Hi All, I have been retired from the job of Rehabilitation Engineer for the California Department of Rehabilitation since 2006, but this had become an issue while I was working. Several of the vehicle modifiers had mentioned the improved reliability of the reduced effort steering systems and the belts which normally provided their power and questioned the need for backup systems. I agree, however, with Mr. Bradly that the cost of any failure could be very high. We all know the reason for reduced effort and zero effort steering (yes, I too am still old school) is the presumption that the driver with a disability could not, in the opinion of the evaluator, safely steer the vehicle without such an assist. It seems to stand to reason therefore that reduced effort steering, at whatever level, is a necessity for drivers with significantly diminished upper extremity strength. But is it needed by all of them? I have definitely known that an able bodied driver can operate a car with a defective power steering unit. One of our younger driving instructors back in the mid '80s drove his car from the Los Angeles CA vicinity to Phoenix AZ and back on the weekend to visit his girlfriend. His power steering had gone out near the end of the week and he had a choice. Fix it or not see his girlfriend that weekend. I cannot vouch for how safe he was but he made it there and back. The point is, however, that no one has really researched/published the force at the wheel rim needed to turn the steering wheel when the power steering is out and the vehicle is moving. (Obviously, it is much more difficult to turn the wheel when the vehicle is sitting still, but then not much bad happens at that speed). Instead if just making a decision that back up steering systems are expensive and pose their own safety hazards, perhaps it is time to determine just how much strength is needed to get the vehicle to the side of the road (or negotiate a slight bend in the road) if the belt breaks when a vehicle is traveling at 60 mph. Or how much strength is needed to turn the wheel enough to follow an off ramp at 35 mph if the belt breaks. The loss of steering fluid from a leak is a different story and that is the reason for the extra fluid reservoir which normally comes with a backup system. The total loss of fluid may only be preceded by some signs of "steam" and smell from the engine compartment for the alert driver, followed by the onset of the backup steering pump. Unfortunately many drivers may not notice the earlier signs or even the "whine" of the backup pump (or even the meaning of that seldom seen lamp on their control panel), so when all the fluid is gone, they will have no power steering, with or without an installed backup system. They may also run the risk of fire which, without quick action could disable the power needed to operate the lift and door openers. I would like to see information available to evaluators on how much strength is actually needed to control a moving vehicle without reduced effort steering and information available to evaluators about warnings to be given to drivers with disabilities about first signs of power/reduced effort steering failure and what to do immediately. I am not sure whether these are projects best pursued by NMEDA or ADED, but both should be involved since both organizations are stakeholders in the safety of the drivers. Norm Simoes