Re: [artworks] Bug fixes for AW upgrade 2.75
- From: Richard Ashbery <riscos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: artworks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:51:56 +0100
In article <ccd7da164f.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Martin Wuerthner
<lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In message <4f16513ab9riscos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Richard Ashbery
> <riscos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > In article <efd6eb154f.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Martin
> > Wuerthner <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> In message <4f15e841f7riscos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Richard Ashbery
> >> <riscos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
> >>
> >> Yes, though the graduated transparency was never really lost, it
> >> was just not transformed, so the graduation often ended up being
> >> somewhere outside the object.
> >
> > I agree the transparency is still there but as you so succinctly
> > point out it is outside the object. I can work-around the problem
> > so it does not cause a lot of grief.
> I think there is a misunderstanding. What I described above was the
> situation before the problem was fixed. In ArtWorks 2.75, the
> graduation *is* transformed correctly, so there should not be any
> need to work around the problem.
I have just tried this again (AW, version 2.75) with a simple square
object that has been distorted with the Envelope tool and linear
graduated transparency applied using the default - from 50% to 100%.
The object was then rotated through 180 degrees. The linear graduation
doesn't move with the rotated object.
What could I be doing wrongly?
Perplexed
Richard
------------------------------------------------------------
To change, suspend or cancel your subscription go to
//www.freelists.org/list/artworks
------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
