[AR] Re: methane to methanol

  • From: Henry Spencer <hspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Arocket List <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:25:18 -0400 (EDT)

On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, William Claybaugh wrote:

That said, I imagine nobody would object to a 1200 sec. ISP mono propellant....

Well, nobody except the explosives regulators, anyway! :-)

"Since practical monopropellants of relatively high specific impulse are, no doubt, much more hazardous than [nitromethane], there is serious doubt that the term 'monopropellant' is really more than an optimistic rocketryman's terminology for a dangerous liquid high explosive." -- M.A. Cook, in Vance & Duke, "Applied Cryogenic Engineering", 1962.

Henry

Other related posts: