[AR] airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)
- From: Henry Spencer <hspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Arocket List <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 15:37:41 -0400 (EDT)
On Sun, 3 Apr 2016, Paul Mueller wrote:
So in a sense, a turbofan (moving away from turbojets now) is basically
a ducted fan, driven by a smaller turbine engine. And in the case of big
high-bypass turbofans, they are essentially big ducted fans.
Yes, pretty much so. The fan is essentially a specialized high-speed
propeller, powered by the turbojet-like core, running in a duct that
shapes the high-speed air flow. The duct is aerodynamically important --
it's not just a housing for the fan -- because it lets you avoid the big
limitation of propellers: the dramatic drop in efficiency when their
blade tips go supersonic.
The resemblance to turboprops has recently gotten even stronger with the
first operational geared-fan engines, which have a gearbox between the
core and the fan so their rotational speeds can be optimized separately.
(The idea has come up before, but now they're actually starting to enter
airline service.)
Makes me wonder why smaller "traditional" ducted fans (like on airships
or the E-fan aircraft) have much fewer blades, not a big blade disk like
a turbofan.
Don't know for sure, but I would expect that it's because they're
optimized for much lower airspeeds.
At the opposite end of the speed spectrum, in engines optimized for
sustained supersonic speeds, the fan tends to disappear entirely. (The
prevalence of turbofans, albeit low-bypass ones, in fighters is mainly
because they mostly fly at subsonic speeds, with occasional brief
supersonic sprints.)
And if what you want is not efficient cruise, but rapid acceleration --
people often don't appreciate that this is a radically different class of
mission -- then it becomes very appealing to add three or four zeros to
the density of the oxidizer by pouring LOX into a tank in advance, rather
than struggling to collect and compress passing air. The cost is carrying
the extra mass of the LOX. The benefits are much easier engineering, and
vastly lighter and more powerful engines.
Henry
Other related posts:
- » [AR] airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon) - Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Rand Simberg
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- qbert
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- George Herbert
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- qbert
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Ian Woollard
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Troy Prideaux
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Peter Fairbrother
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Evan Daniel
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Ian Woollard
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: airbreathing engines (was Re: Re: to the stars, soon)- Ian Woollard