[AR] Re: Rocket Lab's Rutherford Engine

  • From: Peter Fairbrother <zenadsl6186@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 22:48:52 +0100

On 09/08/16 21:33, Jonathan Goff wrote:

Lars,

I can't really say much more about them than they have on their website
(http://www.ursamajortechnologies.com/), but they seem to think making a
turbopump in that scale is doable. They have many of the former core
personnel from Blue Origin's BE-3 engine on their team now at Ursa
Major, so I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt that they know what
they're talking about. But yeah, making a staged combustion engine that
size isn't a trivial engineering task.

Indeed.

Going even smaller, I have been working on a 400N (90 lbf) to 1,000N (220 lbf) LOX-rich staged combustion engine for approaching ten years now.


The hard bit is not making or designing the turbines however; or even making the pumps, which is fairly easy (in comparison to everything else) - it is the design of the pumps.


Compared to pumps, designing turbines is easy-peasy, even though you may be taking 20kW from a turbine the size of a dollar coin ...

Making the turbines is hard, especially materials for LOX-rich ones - 700C reactive dirty oxygen at 3,000 psi and 1,000 m/s is not exactly forgiving -


But even that pales in comparison with designing the pumps.



So, it's not like making watches. It's much harder.

And more fun :-)


-- Peter Fairbrother




~Jon

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Lars Osborne <lars.osborne@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:lars.osborne@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    >And Ursa Major Technologies is working on a 5klbf LOX/Kero staged
    combustion engine that may also provide another data point once they
    get it firing.

    Wow. Stage combustion sounds very challenging to scale down.

    Does this also mean they are using small scale turbopumps and
    turbines? Perhaps they are taking some new approach? Maybe they are
    determined to prove Doug Jones et. al incorrect that "small scale
    turbines are an exercise in watch-making".



    Thanks,
    Lars Osborne

    On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Paul Breed <paul@xxxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

        The LR-40

        
http://hydrogen-peroxide.us/history-US-General-Kinetics/AIAA-2001-3838_History_of_RMI_Super_Performance_90_Percent_H2O2-Kerosene_LR-40_RE-pitch.pdf
        
<http://hydrogen-peroxide.us/history-US-General-Kinetics/AIAA-2001-3838_History_of_RMI_Super_Performance_90_Percent_H2O2-Kerosene_LR-40_RE-pitch.pdf>


        On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Jonathan Goff <jongoff@xxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:jongoff@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

            And Ursa Major Technologies is working on a 5klbf LOX/Kero
            staged combustion engine that may also provide another data
            point once they get it firing.

            ~Jon

            On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Ben Brockert
            <wikkit@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:wikkit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

                Kestrel is also one of SpaceX's earliest engines.
                They've made big
                improvements on T/W of Merlin over the years, as every
                engine program
                does; I expect a modern Kestrel would be closer to 100:1.

                Ventions has an electric pump fed engine of a similar
                size to
                Rutherford, I wonder if Adam London could be prodded to
                share its
                weight.

                Ben

                On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Zachary Martinez
                <znm3m8@xxxxxxx <mailto:znm3m8@xxxxxxx>> wrote:
                 > Kestrel has a mass of 52kg (115lb) and a vacuum
                thrust of 6900lbs. It is an upper stage engine and only
                has a chamber pressure of 135 psi though.
                 >
                 > Zachary Martinez
                 >
                 >> On Aug 9, 2016, at 6:10 AM, Uwe Klein
                <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                <mailto:uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
                 >>
                 >>> Am 09.08.2016 um 05:06 schrieb Henry Spencer:
                 >>> Aestus engine
                 >>
                 >> 111kg offered on:
                 >> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aestus
                <https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aestus>
                 >>
                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aestus#Aestus_II_.2F_RS-72
                <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aestus#Aestus_II_.2F_RS-72>
                 >>
                 >> This guy has collected a lot of information.
                 >> ( slightly  offset from the "ring"sourcing sites in
                the EN domain.)
                 >> http://www.bernd-leitenberger.de
                <http://www.bernd-leitenberger.de>
                 >>
                 >> uwe
                 >>
                 >>
                 >







Other related posts: