On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:41 AM, David Weinshenker <daze39@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > Keith Henson wrote: > > The trouble is that the physics of even the best rocket fuel leaves > > you with a few percent useful payload. If you can bypass the > > inherently low exhaust velocity of chemical fuels, the situation > > changes radically. > > This doesn't need to be a "trouble" if you simply accept that the > launch vehicle will be large with respect to its final payload. > > Bill alluded to it earlier: Where it does become a problem is mass uncertainty driving payload capability. philip