<https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/combustion-and-flame/vol/92/issue/1>
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/combustion-and-flame/vol/92/issue/1
<https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19930038033>
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19930038033
Anthony J. Cesaroni
President/CEO
Cesaroni Technology/Cesaroni Aerospace
<http://www.cesaronitech.com/> http://www.cesaronitech.com/
(941) 360-3100 x101 Sarasota
(905) 887-2370 x222 Toronto
From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On ;
Behalf Of DH Barr
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2018 3:11 PM
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AR] Re: Accounting for cured HTPB in ProPEP
Can anyone point to an Al Mg and/or Al Mg Li study?
Naively I would assume something like Russian 1420 would have a lower melting /
combusting point and thereby insure a more thorough burn given a typical
geometry vs. standard Al in the same particle size distribution.
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, 1:58 PM Anthony Cesaroni <acesaroni@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:acesaroni@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
…or magnesium/aluminum alloy all the way through. Amorphous silicon and Al/Si
alloys also work well in small motors. What you lose in impulse is made up by
the increase in combustion efficiency.
Anthony J. Cesaroni
President/CEO
Cesaroni Technology/Cesaroni Aerospace
<http://www.cesaronitech.com/> http://www.cesaronitech.com/
(941) 360-3100 x101 Sarasota
(905) 887-2370 x222 Toronto
From: arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ;<mailto:arocket-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ] On
Behalf Of George William Herbert
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2018 2:30 PM
To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [AR] Re: Accounting for cured HTPB in ProPEP
Idly wondering if aluminum up top and magnesium near bottom of cylindrical
motor might help...
-george
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 31, 2018, at 10:04 AM, William Claybaugh <wclaybaugh2@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:wclaybaugh2@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
Yeah, I looked over ISP’s product list and they clearly have a 235 second-ish
propellant for less than about 15 lbsm propellant devices and a 250-ish second
propellant for everything bigger.
Bill
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 11:00 AM Henry Spencer <hspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:hspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018, William Claybaugh wrote:
Given a homogeneous mix, it would seem that the propellant at the bottom
of an SRB would be no further from the nozzle then the propellant at the
top of a 9"diameter motor (of 70" grain length)...