[AR] Re: 3 no 4 no 5 legs.
- From: Ian Woollard <ian.woollard@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:39:54 +0000
On 19 January 2016 at 23:54, William Claybaugh <wclaybaugh2@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Doug might well be technically--even economically--correct
Literally better than the best kind of correct! </futurama>
Bill
--
-Ian Woollard
Sent from my Turing machine
Other related posts:
