[argyllcms] colprof errors

  • From: Alex Jamison <a539jamison@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 15:56:35 -0400

Hello all,

I am using Argyll to generate an input profile for a Hasselblad camera using a 
ColorChecker SG chart. In the past I've obtained good results with options -qm 
-am -u, but recently I am getting errors of >70 and average >17, whereas if I 
eliminate those options the error is <20 and average <2. What might account for 
this huge discrepancy, considering that the -am and -u options seem to be 
recommended for digital camera input profiles in the documentation.

By the way, colprof runs much more quickly invoking the options.

Thank you for any insight,

Other related posts: