Hello, I have recently acquired an NEC P221W LCD display and MDSVsensor (NEC custom calibrated X-Rite i1Display2 colorimeter). I'm not running NEC's Spectraview II software because it can't communicate with the monitor over DDC link. NEC said my graphics adapter (Intel HD graphics) is not compatible. My current plan is to calibrate and profile the NEC P221W with ArgyllCMS. I've been using Argyll CMS for a couple of years now on CRT, laptop LCD, WLED LCD and standard-gamut LCD and am pretty happy with it. OK, so here's the native response of my P221W: C:\Argyll_V1.3.2\bin>dispcal -yl -r -P 0.5,0.5,2.0 ... Black level = 0.09 cd/m^2 White level = 122.98 cd/m^2 (at brightness 20%) Aprox. gamma = 2.27 Contrast ratio = 1319:1 White chromaticity coordinates 0.2926, 0.3653 White Correlated Color Temperature = 7174K, DE 2K to locus = 22.3 White Correlated Daylight Temperature = 7144K, DE 2K to locus = 21.5 White Visual Color Temperature = 6102K, DE 2K to locus = 22.1 White Visual Daylight Temperature = 6148K, DE 2K to locus = 21.2 The black level and contrast ratio are great. The colour temperature is a bit high. I verified this with my old Spyder2 colorimeter: Black level = 0.23 cd/m^2 White level = 129.00 cd/m^2 (at brightness 20%) Aprox. gamma = 2.11 Contrast ratio = 549:1 White chromaticity coordinates 0.2923, 0.3691 White Correlated Color Temperature = 7146K, DE 2K to locus = 22.8 White Correlated Daylight Temperature = 7115K, DE 2K to locus = 22.0 White Visual Color Temperature = 6083K, DE 2K to locus = 22.6 White Visual Daylight Temperature = 6116K, DE 2K to locus = 21.8 Never mind the difference in black level and CR, the white point chromacity is nearly identical and I believe my MDSVsensor is fairly accurate. I believe the Spyder2 should measure whites OK even though it is not suitable for measuring extremes of the wide gamut. The problem above is the large DE 2K to locus = 22.0. I can see a greenish cast in the display. The DE is still unsatisfactory when switching to sRGB emulation mode: Black level = 0.09 cd/m^2 White level = 100.31 cd/m^2 (at brightness 20%, with MDSVsensor) Aprox. gamma = 2.25 Contrast ratio = 1080:1 White chromaticity coordinates 0.2987, 0.3565 White Correlated Color Temperature = 6973K, DE 2K to locus = 20.0 White Correlated Daylight Temperature = 6951K, DE 2K to locus = 18.6 White Visual Color Temperature = 6049K, DE 2K to locus = 19.7 White Visual Daylight Temperature = 6139K, DE 2K to locus = 18.3 I noticed that NEC has set different RGB levels for different colour temperature settings. I feel that hardware adjustment with the 10-bit LUT should be better than software adjustment in the 8-bit video LUT. I used dispcal to reduce the green level and shift the white point on to the daylight locus: C:\Argyll_V1.3.2\bin>dispcal -v -yl -g2.2 -b120 NECP221W ... Display type is LCD Target white = native white point Target white brightness = 120.000000 cd/m^2 Target black brightness = native brightness Target advertised gamma = 2.200000 ... Adjust R,G & B gain to desired white point. Press space when done. Initial Br 120.00, x 0.2929 , y 0.3646 , VDT 6149K DE 2K 21.0 \ Current Br 119.05, x 0.3026+, y 0.3187- VDT 7205K DE 2K 0.1 R= G= B= This was achieved with R=100%, G=78.6%, B=100% and I have adjusted brightness as well. Only a little more adjustment was required for D65 at R=100%, G=78.6%, B=92.7%. For comparison, NEC's 5000K setting is R=100%, G=88%, B=69.2%. Here are the final results: patch 64 of 64 Brightness error = 1.691718 cd/m^2 (is 121.035284, should be 119.343567) White point error = 0.233073 deltaE Maximum neutral error (@ 0.828240) = 0.771539 deltaE Average neutral error = 0.353793 deltaE Failed to meet target 0.600000 delta E, got worst case 0.685466 Number of measurements taken = 180 The instrument can be removed from the screen. Written calibration file 'NECP221W.cal' The difference between AdobeRGB (wide gamut) and sRGB (standard gamut) is mainly in the green point. The problem with lowering the green channel is that I have also reduced the gamut of the display. The colours look quite neutral to me after calibration, which is a good thing for RAW photo conversion and white-balancing. I think this is more important than the wide gamut for me. I was hoping for better (perfection) though. Now am I doing this right? Should I be making adjustments in hardware or letting the LUT take care of everything? Does the wide gamut really come at the expense of the neutral white point? Are there better recommendations for calibration and profiling of such a display? Stephen.