[argyllcms] Re: Conversion omitting/locking device colorant

  • From: "Martin Weberg" <martin.weberg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:52:29 +0100

Aaaahh... Too simple... ;-)

Thanks!

Martin Weberg

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:39, Graeme Gill wrote:
> Ah - perhaps you should have mentioned that initially :-)
> If you set the right -k option (ie. xicclu -fif -kv), then the fourth
> number is the target K value, so if the color is in gamut, the K
> target will be met exactly

Other related posts: