Thank you: I hope that you hold it further for a long long time... :-))
About long usage. I've read that even a spectrometer hast to be recalibrated
by the manufacturer.
Is this true. Are you doing this? Or is this moneymaking?
Best regards
A
ndreas
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-
bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Ben Goren
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2017 17:14
An: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [argyllcms] Re: AW: Re: Recommendation for photospectrometer
On Jul 12, 2017, at 8:02 AM, Andreas Mock <andreas.mock@xxxxxx> wrote:
Do you know what the difference is to X-Rite's Colormunki?
By specs and reviews and reputation, the Munki is a fine instrument and
possibly the best value ever offered in a spectrometer. Unless there's a
specific feature that you know you actually need that it lacks, I can't
think of any reason for recommending any other instrument.
It's worth noting that many of the features it lacks are of little to no
importance for the overwhelming majority of graphic arts applications. For
example, everybody naturally gets excited about spectral resolution, but
basically the only use case I can think of where it matters would be in
calibrating a colorimiter to use for profiling a wide-gamut display --
and, even then, the Munki is going to do a good job.
All that writ, I have a Pro, and you can only have mine after you pry it
from my cold, dead fingers. If it's comfortably in your budget, you'll not
regret it.
Cheers,
b&
