Hi all,
My apologies for not setting a time sooner- it looks like this was a
difficult week to get together which I probably could have anticipated! I
have added some times to the poll for next week, if you wouldn't mind
filling that out- we'll see if we can get a time with more people
available.
https://doodle.com/poll/qycnnpvankwq6t7u
Cheers,
Sarah
Sarah Romkey, MAS,MLIS
Archivematica Program Manager
She/her
Artefactual Systems <http://artefactual.com>
604-527-2056
@archivematica <http://www.twitter.com/archivematica> / @accesstomemory
<http://www.twitter.com/accesstomemory>
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 5:47 PM Sara Allain <sallain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,
Just a reminder to fill out this poll if you're interested in talking
about the PSP TOR. Sarah is away this week and Monday is a holiday in
Canada so I think we can safely say that the meeting will not be on
Tuesday, but that Sarah will send out the final time/date on Tuesday.
https://doodle.com/poll/qycnnpvankwq6t7u
-Sara
--
Sara Allain, MI (she/her)
Systems Archivist
Artefactual Systems, Inc. <https://www.artefactual.com/>
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 1:02 PM Sarah Romkey <sromkey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to take some time to refine a bit more and give us all the
chance to discuss the Terms of Reference- this week I'm heads-down on the
1.12 release and next week I'm on vacation- so I have made us a doodle poll
for the following week. If you're interested in chatting about the terms of
reference please fill it out and hopefully one of these times works.
https://doodle.com/poll/qycnnpvankwq6t7u
Cheers,
Sarah
Sarah Romkey, MAS,MLIS
Archivematica Program Manager
She/her
Artefactual Systems <http://artefactual.com>
604-527-2056
@archivematica <http://www.twitter.com/archivematica> / @accesstomemory
<http://www.twitter.com/accesstomemory>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 2:32 PM Geoff Blissitt <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Robert,
I think this is a valid point; certainly there ought to be room for
both.
Perhaps what we are ultimately saying is this: that the group's function
should be strategic as well as tactical; that discussions around items
like the roadmap should consider why as well as how?
Thanks for raising this. I think it’s both important and useful.
Best,
Geoff
On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 16:27, Robert Gillesse <robert.gillesse@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hi Sarah and others,
Thanks for the document! We have not so much specific comments on
(parts of) the document as more a general observation that has been
troubling us for a little while longer and which concern the activities and
goals of the PSP group. The thing is, that we are part of this group not so
much because we want to contribute code (at least not at this moment - our
development work has been done mainly *around* Archivematica, pre- and
-post ingest) but because we want to help out with the roadmap (especially
with the discussion what is core and what is not) and by doing so help
shape the long term vision on Archivematica. This and other documents do
acknowledge this up to a certain point but it is clear that the main focus
is on developing code and make code contribution more efficient and easy.
While this is of great importance we wonder if this other goal of keeping
the Archivematica ship on course is not of equal importance. We could
imagine that these two goals as guiding principles behind the activities of
the PSP group. We could also imagine in this case membership could be
interesting to a wider group of institutions – as some institutes are
serious Archivematica users, and might want to think along, but not
necessary want to contribute code.
We do realize we should have brought up this point earlier and
certainly is not convenient if you want to publish the document tomorrow
(sorry about that), but reading the document made it very clear to us what
we are slightly uneasy about. If you decide to publish this anyway we are
ok with that. We can always discuss this at a later point.
But regardless of the inconvenience of the late moment for bringing
this up, we were wondering if we are alone in this or if our idea of the
group is shared by any of the others. Curious to know what you think.
Kind regards,
Robert and Eric
Robèrt Gillesse
Digital Archivist
*international institute of social history*
Email: robert.gillesse@xxxxxxx
Skype: robert.gillesse
Postbus (PO Box) 2169
NL – 1000 CD Amsterdam
Cruquiusweg 31
NL – 1019 CD Amsterdam
T + 31(0)20 6685866
iisg.amsterdam
*From: *<archivematica-psp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Sarah
Romkey <sromkey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Reply-To: *"archivematica-psp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <
archivematica-psp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Date: *Monday, August 17, 2020 at 4:40 PM
*To: *"archivematica-psp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <
archivematica-psp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject: *[archivematica-psp] Last call for feedback on the Terms of
Reference
Hello all,
Doing one final call for any feedback on the PSP Terms of Reference:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1deRkgDIIWHJjpEBFSMd28cD0G_pr5OlQIm56ubtSIEw/edit#
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1deRkgDIIWHJjpEBFSMd28cD0G_pr5OlQIm56ubtSIEw/edit>
I've incorporated some feedback from Tom- if anyone else has
comments/suggestions, could you please make them by the end of day on
Thursday this week, as I plan to publish on Friday. Of course we can always
make light edits and additions in the future, but we want to make sure we
all largely agree in principle.
Thanks so much,
Sarah
Sarah Romkey, MAS,MLIS
Archivematica Program Manager
She/her
Artefactual Systems <http://artefactual.com>
604-527-2056
@archivematica <http://www.twitter.com/archivematica> / @accesstomemory
<http://www.twitter.com/accesstomemory>
--
Geoff Blissitt
Commercial Director
Tel : 07773 059148
*Max Communications*
3e, Chislehurst High Street
Kent BR7 5AB
020 8309 5445
2, Gunnery Terrace
Cornwallis Road
London SE18 6SW
020 8854 5500
www.maxcommunications.co.uk
*www.royalwarrant.org/company/max-communications-ltd*
<http://www.royalwarrant.org/company/max-communications-ltd>
<https://maxcommunications.co.uk/podcasts-2020/>
*Please note, this email together with any attachments must be treated
as confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender immediately and delete the original email. Any use, copying,
disclosure, alteration or reliance on the contents of this email for
purposes without the named sender’s express authorisation is strictly
prohibited. *
===============================================================================
