Hi all again,
Am 04.04.2016 um 21:54 schrieb Lotte Steenbrink
<lotte.steenbrink@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi all,
since we’re allowed to submit Drafts again now (I think) and we decided to
publish asap, I thought I’d give you a quick status update and wait for your
Go/"Wait a minute, let’s fix this first" signals.
DONE:
————
* All JWD!s are resolved now
* out of 90 JWD and JWD! comments, 64 are done (I’ve attached my copy of
Justin’s review if you want to look for the remaining 26 TODOs, it’s the file
called "draft-ietf-manet-aodvv2-13 (2).txt")
* added revised security considerations
TO DO:
————
* Most notable of the 26 JWDs that are yet to be resolved:
+ (is there some table that lists routes that are being waited on? JWD)
We decided to add a separate
RREP table that lists them and I’ve volunteered to write text for
that, but every time I set out to do that,
I got more confused… I’m starting to worry about the amount of
tables AODVv2 needs by now, and
I’ve been picking Vickys brain on how to achieve storing that info
without having to add another table,
but it’s an ongoing process.
+ the approaching the limit thing we’re currently discussing in
„[aodvv2-discuss] Re: Justin's review"
* some TODOs in security considerations (see github)
* still waiting for Chris’ feedback regarding the revised 5444 multiplexer
wording, so that hasn’t changed yet
* Make it more clear that AODVv2 currently doesn’t support RREQs for prefixes
to make Thomas happy (I’m planning to do that tomorrow afternoon)
What do you think?
Regards,
Lotte
<draft-ietf-manet-aodvv2-13 (2).txt>
<draft-ietf-manet-aodvv2-14d-from-c.diff.html>
<draft-ietf-manet-aodvv2-14d.txt>
