Ok I’ll just set up a hangout
On 4 Mar 2016, at 16:05, Charlie Perkins <charles.perkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm here and looking for more email about this now...
Regards,
Charlie P.
On 3/4/2016 2:09 AM, John Dowdell wrote:
OK so can we fit in in today? I know Charlie will be asleep right now (2am
Pacific) but if we can set it for 1600 or 1700 UK (sorry Lotte, know that’s
+1 hour your time) and we can let Charlie know in time, we can keep
Charlie’s hope of an offline week alive.
Regards
John
On 3 Mar 2016, at 21:31, Charlie Perkins <
<mailto:charles.perkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>charles.perkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:charles.perkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hello folks,
The family here is off next week for a vacation that's been planned for
months. The plane tickets are bought, the accomodations paid for.
I will nevertheless attempt to be online and be present at the meeting. I
don't yet know if we will have WiFi connectivity but most places do these
days. Monday morning seems as good a time as any to me. My dreams of
being completely offline have evaporated into stale air.
Whatever I can accomplish by email before the hangout, please let me know.
Regards,
Charlie P.
On 3/3/2016 12:53 PM, Victoria Mercieca wrote:
On 3 Mar 2016 17:46, "Stan Ratliff" <
<mailto:ratliffstan@xxxxxxxxx>ratliffstan@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:ratliffstan@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
All,
I'd like to propose we setup a Google hangout, for early next week. I am
personally prepared to do this at any time of the day - so my input
would be that if it's needed at 3:00AM East Coast US time to accommodate
the UK folks, so be it. But this is "all hands on deck, complete and
total crunch time".
Pretty much any time will be ok with me, but how about 5pm UK time Monday?
That's a normal time slot for a hangout, its not too unsociable for anyone
is it?
Vicky.
As to the agenda - Justin raised (according to Justin) 3 "major" points
in his review. We also know about the Security Considerations section.
So, I'd like to quickly, crisply go over those 3 or 4 points, figure out
where we are, and who has volunteered to do what.
Another point - for those of us that tend to "rhetorically wander" a bit
(and I'm primarily looking at *myself* in the mirror, and you, Mr.
Perkins) - I implore all of us to keep it crisp, sharp, and to the
point. The goal is to resolve the issues, clearing any and all
roadblocks to publication.
Other thoughts?
Let's go get 'em.
Regards,
Stan
