I didn't get a moderation email on it. Didn't see it either.
Stan
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 11, 2016, at 1:59 PM, John Dowdell <john.dowdell486@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I didn't see the email either. Perhaps Stan needs to moderate it.
Regards
John
From: Victoria Mercieca
Sent: 11/01/2016 08:24
To: aodvv2-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aodvv2-discuss] Re: Draft 13g
Wednesday sounds good :)
Also, I didn't see that email...
Regards,
Vicky.
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Lotte Steenbrink
<lotte.steenbrink@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,
Am 08.01.2016 um 19:01 schrieb John Dowdell <john.dowdell486@xxxxxxxxx>:
I can't do Tuesday but can do the other days next week
How about wednesday at our usual time?
(also, did everyone get the E-Mail from the Model Checking folks at the Uni
of Tehran? I tried to forward it to the list but I think I didn't succeed...)
Regards,
Lotte
John
From: Lotte Steenbrink
Sent: 08/01/2016 14:05
To: aodvv2-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aodvv2-discuss] Re: Draft 13g
Hi Vicky, hi all,
Am 08.01.2016 um 14:59 schrieb Victoria Mercieca <vmercieca0@xxxxxxxxx>:
Hi Justin,
The discussion we have received so far on the MANET list seemed to be
mainly a repetition of comments from draft 11 which Thomas Clausen did not
feel were addressed in draft 12. I think before we release a draft 13 we
need to reach a consensus amongst ourselves on these issues and their
resolutions, which is what I was hoping would happen, based on the
document I sent to this list the other day and hopefully a teleconference
early next week.
Is everyone available for a teleconference early next week?
I am. (Thursday might be problematic at our usual time, otherwise I'm
available) Sorry for my silence, I'm working my way through the draft now!
Best regards,
Lotte
Regards,
Vicky.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Justin Dean <bebemaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To help move things along it would be helpful to have a new version
released to the working group. If we are going to get this document
finished/last called before the next meeting we are going to need quicker
turn around times and more discussion happening on the Manet list. I'd
like to encourage an official revision update.
Justin
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Victoria Mercieca <vmercieca0@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Very little has changed since 13f, but heres the most up-to-date version
in case you wish to refer to it while looking at the document from my
earlier email....
Vicky.
