Ruby, all, I think it would be excellent if Helsinki City could arrange a seminar around its global responsibility strategy! Unfortunately I don't personally know anyone (but Thomas who's already on this list) that I could suppose being able to find the right people. Any suggestions how to put forward such a proposal? --Pekka On 2014–04–13, at 19:41 , Ruby van der Wekken <rubyvdwekken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dear all, > > A (very) late thank you for joining me to the list, Pekka! > As Pekka already referred to, eventhough I should always be practising my > Finnish, I will continue in English :) > > It was a pity I was not able to join for the seminar held, though ofcourse it > was good to hear through Niklas and also Pekka about the seminar. We were in > STAP glad this seminar was held! > > Thank you also for the reading list Pekka! I have read too little on the > issues, whilst a few works mentioned by Pekka are familiar. However, besides > for the concrete learning through our developing of Stadin Aikapankki, what > for me have been particularly good learning instances has been the > participating of a economy and commons conference in Berlin in May 2013, as > well as the complementary currency conference last June 2013 in Holland. As > the name has come up in the context of the seminar held, there I had among > other the pleasure of meeting with Bernard Lietaer and having a substantial > discussion with him on Stadin Aikapankki, which ofcourse was a privelege. > > At the moment of this writing, we are in Stadin Aikapankki preparing for a > next membership meeting, in which we will be discussing regarding our next > steps in this process around the issue of aikapankki and taxation. Niklas > has told during the seminar about our internal tovivero - the currently few > percentage timetax which is deducted from every tovi earned, and which > members of aikapankki can put towards an economic actor participating in the > timebank, and thus operating with a commitment to our values, see > http://stadinaikapankki.wordpress.com/abc/ > As such, the internal timetax is a way to be strengthening ethical economic > actors in our timebank, and to promote solidarity/new ecomy practices - all > kind of new ways of building and cooperating through the timebank can > potentially take form supported by the tax. > > In addition, I have come to understand this is importantly also a way to > think of a democratising of the public. If we could imagine a city as > Helsinki having its Globaali vastuu strategy document in which it has stated > that “Sosiaalisen kestävyyden, kaupunkilaisten omaehtoisen elämän ja talouden > vakauden edistämiseksi kaupunki selvittää, miten se voi tukea aikapankkien > toimintaa.” ; if we could be coming to a pilot situation in which would be > assessed > - aikapankki and its ABC working, and in howfar this is producing hyvinvointi; > - the workings of its internal tovitax which is put to ethical actors > accepted onto the timebank (note, the issue of which ethical economic actors > are accepted onto the timebank is an issue subject to peoples deliberation, > and as such a difficult issue to reckon with in public policy, but an > important feature of new economy building!) > - and to then have a dialogue on the results of this assessment, concerning > any adaptions or law changes necessary which would enalbe experiences like > Stadin Aikapankki and its ABC to be carrying on, > could that be a good way forward? > > But so, these are just some personal words here. As said, Stadin Aikapankki > members are to discuss the issue, and following this idea is to retake > contact with Helsinki City - and well, personally I am hoping a process can > be set in place. > > A first step thought which has also arisen, is for whether or not the city > could be organising a seminar, in wich decent time would be spent on really > understanding the potential of aikapankki as a timebank, as a community > complementary currency, and to address the issue of complementary timetax. It > would then also be very possible to invite someone of our contacts to come > over to reinforce this process. There are many related discussions going on > globally; on complementary currencies and the issue of taxation, on the > related issue of new economy building and on how to create place for this and > support, also in terms of public policy. Different experiences and > legislation exists, internationally each experience also seems to have run > into its own issues, i.e. according to my knowledg there does not yet exist > an optimal situation anywhere, in which it is fully possible for a > complementary currency to pay taxes in the complementary currency (sometimes > forinstance one can pay taxes in the complementary tax, but the tax is then > converted into the national currency), and to in this way support new, > ethical and participatory economy building according to peoples values, and > with this enabling a democratising of the public. > > Well, this for now, a message which was long due from my side, > > All comments would be highly appreciated! > And, after we have had our discussion in Stadin Aikapankki, and more > developed our proposal, myself and Niklas can also be sharing more on this > list. > > with kind regards, > Ruby > > > > > > > 2014-03-04 18:23 GMT+02:00 Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@xxxxxx>: > Tervehdys, > > Alla kirjalista jolla lähdimme liikkelle. Kahneman, Graeber, Lietaer ja > Itäranta tulivat luettua. > > Kahneman on asiaa mutta ainakin minulle suurelta osalta tuttua. Graeberin > olin lukenut muutama vuosi sitten, mutta sen uudelleen lukeminen ei ollut > haitaksi. Lieaterin tämä teos on vähän pamflettimainen, ei niin vakuuttava > kuin Future of Money. Itäranta on kevyt välipala, ihan hauska dystopia mutta > näitä on muitakin, oleellisesti saman juonen olen mielestäni lukenut joskus > aikaisemminkin, mutta en muista mistä. Itse luin lisäksi Restakisin, joka oli > -- ahem -- mielenkiintoinen. > > http://www.lietaer.com/writings/books/the-future-of-money/ > > Matkan varrella mukaan tuli sitten Jared Diamondin Collapse, jonka itse olin > lukenut jo joitakin vuosia sitten. Jotkut lukivat Andersonin, jotkut eivät, > Unger jäi käsittääkseni kaikilta lukematta. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapse_(book) > > --Pekka > > Alkuperäinen lista: > > Daniel Kahneman: Thinking, Fast and Slow > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking,_Fast_and_Slow > > David Graeber: Debt: The First 5000 Years > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt:_The_First_5000_Years > > Bernard Lietaer: Money and Sustainability: The Missing Link > http://www.triarchypress.com/pages/Money-and-Sustainability.htm > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Lietaer > > EMMI ITÄRANTA: Teemestarin kirja > http://www.teos.fi/kirjat/kaikki/s2012/teemestarin-kirja.html > > John Restakis: Humanizing the Economy: Co-operatives in the Age of Capital > http://www.amazon.co.uk/Humanizing-Economy-Co-operatives-Environmental-Economics/dp/086571651X > http://blogbusinessworld.blogspot.fi/2011/01/humanizing-economy-co-operatives-in-age.html > > Chris Andersson: Makers: The New Industrial Revolution > http://www.makers-revolution.com/#2aa/custom_plain > > Roberto Mangabeira Unger: Politics: A Selection > http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1859841317 > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roberto_Mangabeira_Unger > http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/unger/philosophy.php > > > On 2014–03–04, at 12:54 , "Hiilamo, Heikki T" <heikki.hiilamo@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > Hei! > > > > Kirjalista kiinnostaa kovasti, voisiko sen jakaa listalla? > > > > yst. Heikki Hiilamo > > > > > > On Mar 3, 2014, at 6:00 PM, Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Listan luomisen jälkeen listalle on ilmoittautunut muutama uusi ihminen. > >> Mutta hiljaista on ollut. > >> > >> Onkohan kenelläkään ehdotuksia, miten voisimme konkreettisesti jatkaa > >> keskustelua? Olen edelleen itse motivoitunut ajamaan asioita siihen > >> suuntaan, että veroja voisi maksaa paikalisvaluutoilla. En vain tiedä > >> mitä voisin käytännössä tehdä asian edistämiseksi. > >> > >> --Pekka Nikander > >> > >> PS. At least one new list member can follow Finnish discussions, but may > >> have problems in writing comprehendible Finnish. Therefore from now the > >> list policy is to allow both Finnish and English, interchangeably, so that > >> anyone can express their thoughts in a convenient enough language. > >> > >> PPS. Jos joku haluaa listan kaikista kirjoista, joita lukupiirissä > >> luimme, laitan mieluusti listalle. Muutenkin voisi olla hyvä idea kertoa > >> hyvistä kirjoista. Vai olisiko? > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >