yeah i agree can't RNIB make a small box to plug in to a sky or virgin boxx as wel to read for them? On Jul 1, 2010, at 9:35 AM, Damon Rose wrote: > hi John. I think I probably speak for others here when I say that this kind > of info is heartening and helps us understand what RNIB are doing amid this > acceleration of digital products and services. Thank you for communicating to > us and I hope to see more from you in the coming months. Government are > pushing the digital industry buttons quite heavily and recognise what it > could bring to end users. Blind people are twelve years behind on this basic > EPG access stuff and it seems the community are getting a bit restless as > video on demand and other services start popping up. > > Can you tell us a bit more about this chipset? > > I'd be particularly interested to know what it does? Is it simply a speech > synthesizer? Or does it have more on board? How versatile is it? And is it > environmentally friendly? > > I'm assuming RNIB doesn't give the chipset away for free to manufacturers, so > who distributes it, who sells it and how much would it cost a manufacturer to > a) purchase it and b) intergrate it into their technology and physically weld > it to their motherboards? Or maybe RNIB does give it away for free? In which > case it'd be interesting to hear about the challenges of getting it included > in boxes on that interesting basis. > > I'd like to hear a bit moore about why you chose to make and market a chipset > towrds manufacturers rather than an add-on aimed at blind consumers. This > will mean that manufacturers have to include the accessible talking elements > into every single box and hence dramatically increase their costs. Will > manufacturers be persuaded to do that? And off the back of that, why did RNIB > choose not to create a universal speech box that could plug into the back of > any hardware that has the right software API? The latter would make end users > foot the bill for the accessibility and would avoid having to persuade > manufacturers to spend thousands on including the hardware in their boxes - > which I imagine is an incredibly hard task for which RNIB may not have the > resources to achieve. > > If the answer to this is "we believe everyone should have equal access" then > I assume you must be some way down the line to getting government to accept > that legislation has to be the answer ... so that manufacturers are forced to > include your chipset or develop something cost effective for themselves. > > I believe that the Pure Sonus radio, a fantastic product, was discontinued > because they didn't sell as many as they hoped. If this experience has > coloured the general feeling in the consumer electronics industry, then they > wil have to be forced rather than persuaded. And as digital technology takes > off, with faster broadband promised soon, we can only assume that we are > going to lose out heavily if legislation isn't passed sooner rather than > later. So it'd be good to have an update on campaigning and discussions > around this. > > Project Canvas boxes will be released next year and will have an API that > supports some kind of speech output by then (it's due to be included in the > next software rollout I believe). Do you have a partner ready to roll out > Canvas enabled boxes so that people who can't see the screen at all are able > to access iPlayer, 4OD and the other digital and on demand services that will > come as default on those boxes? > > The really interesting thing about set-top boxes is that they play far better > to RNIB's core customer base - older people who aren't quite so au fait with > computers. An incredibly easy interfface can be achieved with a set-top box > in comparison to a computer, with services and digital entertainment > available. And it looks like RNIB understands this as you are talking about > having magazines delivered via set-top box. I'd suggest that things like > video phones built into the set-top box could be far more empowering to all > visually impaired people attempting to live as independently as possible > (video appointments with doctors, asking family to look over clothing to see > if it's clean, looking at instruction on food or drugs from afar) > > It'd be great to hear responses to this. From my discussions with sources in > the industry, I feel there are far more barriers than we, the blind > community, appreciate. It feels unnecessarily complicated. And I should just > add that if I can lend my support to a campaign towards access legislation, > I'd be more than willing to put in some time and effort. I suspect a number > of people here would be happy to do that too. > > How about if RNIB were to give a 10 minute presentation on their work towards > a digital future and post it up on YouTube or as a podcast on the popular > Blind Cooll Tech blog? Or if there already is an RNIB blog about this kind of > thing, or someone else close to these projects, can you point us at it? > > I appreciate that people like us on these tech lists are pushing the envelope > and are more likely to be early adopters than older users. But it is we who > are using and testing things today that all blind consumers could be using > tomorrow ... we can see the benefits already. > > And finally John, how high are your confidence levels on getting good > comprehensive access to set-top boxes and digital services in the living > room? Do you expect products to be on our TV sets within a year? Two years? > I'm remembering back to how audio description was being broadcast for many > years without anyone being able to pick it up. 12 years later, there are a > number of products out there ... I for one never expected it to take so long > or appear to be such a slog to achieve. > > Appreciated. > > ...Damon > > > > > From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > JOHN > Sent: 30 June 2010 18:49 > To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [access-uk] Accessible Set top box > > hello, > > I do hope people will welcome the new settop box and some of you will come > > and see it at Sight Village along with several other innovative new > > products from RNIB. It doesn't all stop with the Penfriend you know! > > I thought it might be helpful to give you now as much of the background to > the development of the settop box as I can. So I apologise for the length of > this post. > > > There are three elements to our work on accessible TV. > > First, RNIB has developed a chipset which can be used in any TV, settop box, > entertainment centre, DAB radio etc to make it speak. This chipset is now > available in the electronics industry and those of you who have picked up the > promotion from Ocean Blue can see an early example of companies taking up our > technology. Our intention, quite simply, is to take away any barriers, actual > or perceived, which put manufacturers off designing speech output into new > devices. By using our chipset they can, if they choose, make all new TVs and > boxes talk. Like all commercial companies they will do this if either > government legislation makes them do it or if they believe there is a > commercial opportunity. > > The second element was for us to get our own box designed and built and made > available right now. Making the chipset available to manufacturers doesn't > actually guarantee that anybody will make a box. So we've done it ourselves > with Goodmans. The box will be available in the high street as well as from > RNIB. We provide accessible instructions of course and we suspect that many > high street stores won't want the administrative hassle of dealing with VAT > exemption forms. But it's just up to you where you want to buy it! It's your > choice. > > We hope that it will also feature in the government Help scheme for the > digital switchover. And, of course, if manufacturers do start to pick up on > accessibility in the mainstream there will be new products at lower prices > and with better functionality round the corner so, just like everybody else, > it will be almost impossible to know when will be the right time to buy a box > because the day after you take the plunge somebody will advertise one twice > as good for half the price. but that's just life! > > > The third element was to make technology which manufacturers and broadcast > distributors (like Sky and Virgin) could use to make an add-on box to make > their existing set top boxes talk without having to roll out whole new boxes. > . Again it is up to those companies to decide just how they implement their > own solutions. What we have done is make it possible for them and other > manufacturers to offer accessible products at very low additional cost. > > So we will continue to work with and apply pressure to companies to bring out > more accessible products as soon as possible. However nothing works better > than individual blind people contacting companies and saying clearly why > accessibility is so important. > > We will also be developing a PVR with recording capabilities ourselves which > we intend will also be able to recieve our magazines, newspapers and books > for download too. But I can't right now give you an accurate date for that to > be ready. > > As you may imagine it is difficult to get it right when it comes to sharing > information about things in development. It is so easy to raise expectations > only to disappoint customers because something has slipped in the schedule or > problems that weren't anticipated have come up. > > So I am being as open about what we are doing and why as I think makes most > sense now. I won't put a blow by blow account on this list to monitor > progress over the next few months. I just hope that based on the information > above and on you seeing developments like the Penfriend that you will trust > the folks here in RNIB Products are definitely on your side and working as > hard as we can to remove barriers and make life that bit more accessible for > us all. We're just as mad as the rest of you that sometimes things which seem > so straightforward and obvious take so long to become real. > > With good wishes, > > John Godber > > Head of Products and Publications > > > > http://www.bbc.co.uk > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal > views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. > If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. > Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance > on it and notify the sender immediately. > Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. > Further communication will signify your consent to this.