Hello, My thanks to Bert and Kilroy and Gary for digging into the facts. Gary wrote: > For CGMS-A, the set top is supposed to assert one of the following in line 21 > (the XDS bits IIRC) In Europe it is a different line. The information is carried in a similar way as the widescreen signalling bits, but the result is the same: > 0 - Copying_Is_Permitted_Without_Restriction > 1 - No_Further_Copying_Permitted > 2 - One_Generation_Of_Copies_May_Be_Made > 3 - No_Copying_Is_Permitted > And your PVR or DVD recorder is supposed to obey all this nonsense, assuming > it didn't get accidentally turned off when you made it region free... What I have heard is: - Philips DVD/HDD recorders faithfully obey the CGMS-A flags, and - some programs are indeed transmitted with "No_Copying_Is_Permitted". So I have read some complaints by very surprised consumers on the internet. Let it be known that I am not against copy protection. And I understand why Disney protects its very expensive tapes (and DVDs). But this will lead to the situation that you can not even timeshift a program anymore. Timeshifting is caching, which is not the same as copying. The program is typically stored on the harddisk in such a way that it can not (easily) be extracted from it (by a PC) and burned on a DVD. So it is a cache copy. It can not live outside the recorder. (If everything is well..) A cache copy should not be seen as a real copy. If caching were forbidden then all Internet Providers would be sued for caching peer-to-peer traffic and thus distributing copyrighted content. But they are exempted. The least that they (we) could allow is some sort of self-destruct mechanism, where a "No_Copying_Is_Permitted" program is automatically deleted after having been viewed. Or after so many hours or days of being stored. Whatever. This DVDR3300H always records first to the hard disk, and then you can make a copy to DVD. I know that if it receives a " One_Generation_Of_Copies_ May_Be_Made" program, then when you copy it to a DVD the original on the hard disk is automatically deleted. And the copy will probably be marked "No_Further_Copying_Permitted". Fair enough. Fair enough ? "One Generation of Copies" is not the same as "One Copy" ! This already seems to be a mis-interpretation of the Rules. But why can't we have some sort of exception for a temporary cache copy on the hard disk for a "No_Copying_Is_Permitted" program ? Surely we do not want to be denied the joy of timeshifting ?! Are there similar issues with the Broadcast Flag in the USA ? How is the acceptance by the public ? Best regards, -- Jeroen +-------------------------------+------------------------------------------+ | From: Jeroen H. Stessen | E-mail: Jeroen.Stessen@xxxxxxxxxxx | | Building: SFJ-5.22 Eindhoven | Deptmt.: Philips Applied Technologies | | Phone: ++31.40.2732739 | Visiting & mail address: Glaslaan 2 | | Mobile: ++31.6.44680021 | NL 5616 LW Eindhoven, the Netherlands | | Skype: callto:jeroen.stessen | Website: http://www.apptech.philips.com/ | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------------+ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.