Delphi Inspiration wrote: > Correct, SQLiteSpy does not include the load_extension() SQL function. > > This is because SQLiteSpy uses DISQLite3 as its database engine and > DISQLite3 uses Delphi's default "fastcall" calling convention instead of > C's "cdecl". "fastcall" passes parameters in registers and is usually > faster than "cdecl". Unfortunately, "fastcall" is incompatible with > existing SQLite extensions already written in C. To avoid all confusion, > I exclude loadable extensions from DISQLite3 and SQLiteSpy. Did not know about the differing calling conventions between DISQLite3 and the other C-derived binaries like "official" sqlite3.exe/dll. > Therefore I am not sure if this justifies the amount of work to > implement and maintain loadable extensions for DISQLite3. All SQLite > core functions must be wrapped by a "cdecl" to "fastcall" translation > wrapper. > > Is this worth the effort? What do others think? In that case it is not worth the effort, I think. If I really want to create my extension I will use it with the sqlite3.exe binary then. Thanks for the feedback, Tobias _______________________________________________ Delphi Inspiration mailing list yunqa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx //www.freelists.org/list/yunqa