[x500standard] Re: Revocation list definitions
- From: David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: x500standard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, SG17-Q11 <T13sg17q11@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:37:26 +0100
On 25/04/2014 14:59, Erik Andersen wrote:
> David Cooper wrote:
>
>
>
> “Contrary to what the defect report says, X.509 intentionally defined
> CRL to include revocation lists that covered public-key certificates and
> revocation lists that covered attribute certificates,”
>
There are two issues here
1. The use of the acronym CRL. To what does it refer
2. Whether a single revocation list can include both PKCs and ACs.
David are you addressing the first point only, or both points? If the
latter, what are you saying about point 2.
regards
David
-----
www.x500standard.com: The central source for information on the X.500 Directory
Standard.
Other related posts:
