Re: [Wittrs] Philosophy: Dead, Half Dead, Asleep, AWOL, Flourishing, or ???
- From: "walto" <walterhorn@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Wittgenstein's Aftermath <wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 01:11:11 -0000
--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Sean Wilson <whoooo26505@...> wrote:
>
> (reply to Walter)
>
> That I don't read free will debates, and that I have rightly come to
> understand certain philosophic conversations as being pointless, does not
> mean that I criticize in the dark. You've never been able to understand that
> point. (That's like the Carnap point you still don't get).
>
>
> Regards and thanks.
>
> Dr. Sean Wilson, Esq.
> [spoiler]Assistant Professor
> Wright State University
> Personal Website: http://seanwilson.org
> SSRN papers: http://tinyurl.com/3eatnrx
> Wittgenstein Discussion: http://seanwilson.org/wiki/doku.php?id=wittrs
> [/spoiler]
>
Oh, yes, I've often heard you SAY that you know something about analytic
philosophy or that an argument COULD be made for this or that proposition. You
just never get around to making any such argument. It's about like your go
game, I'm afraid: all bluster about what others don't get.
But let's not quibble. You explain to me why saying that some philosophical
proposition is nonsense is unlike Carnap saying precisely the same thing in
precisely the same context, and I'll listen carefully.
W
_______________________________________________
Wittrs mailing list
Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://undergroundwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/wittrs_undergroundwiki.org
Other related posts:
- » Re: [Wittrs] Philosophy: Dead, Half Dead, Asleep, AWOL, Flourishing, or ???- Sean Wilson
- » Re: [Wittrs] Philosophy: Dead, Half Dead, Asleep, AWOL, Flourishing, or ??? - walto
