[Wittrs] Re: The Self-Refuting Argument
- From: "Cayuse" <z.z7@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 17:08:23 -0000
Joseph Polanik wrote:
what basis would any philosopher have to claim
that self-referencing is inherently nonsensical?
Self-reference is not nonsensical when it refers to the
physical organism in the world -- it only becomes nonsensical
when it refers to "the experiencer" or to "the agent of action".
The problem begins when these two notions are accreted
onto the idea of self as a physical organism in the world.
==========================================
Manage Your AMR subscription: //www.freelists.org/list/wittrsamr
For all your Wittrs needs: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/
Other related posts:
