Cayuse wrote:
Joseph Polanik wrote:
you propose a false dichotomy in that you only consider the possibility that there is an infinite regress of experiencers and the possibility that experience must always be reflexive. however, there is at least one other possibility: that awareness of experiencing while experiencing comes and goes; meaning, that some experience is reflexive.If experience is sometimes reflexive and sometimes not, then experience cannot be reflexive by its very nature.
and, therefore ... what?what follows from the recognition that experience is not inherently reflexive?
Joe -- Nothing Unreal is Self-Aware @^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@ http://what-am-i.net @^@~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@^@ ========================================== Manage Your AMR subscription: //www.freelists.org/list/wittrsamr For all your Wittrs needs: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/