[Wittrs] Re: [C] [quickphilosophy] Wittgenstein contra Kant and Darwin/Dennett
- From: Rajasekhar Goteti <rgoteti@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 09:01:29 +0530 (IST)
There is a distinction between believing a system and using a system.Any system
whether it be scientific,economic,religious and also linguistic.
Whether it is from inside or outside One can not think about unknown which is
also unthinkable.What one is thinking is the known that also with a reference
only.
Philosophy shows the known and its limitations but not suggesting any thing
unthinkable.Some philosophers have given the importance for the system more
than a person.Some had given importance for the person rather than a system.But
both are related ideologies pertaining to a particular system.
One thing is very clear Language is for functionality and gained importance
since it is functional.In due course It had become voluminous.Now the scene is
a person is a speckbefore that.
thank you
sekhar
It should delimit the thinkable and therewith the unthinkable. It
should limit the unthinkable from inside, by way of the thinkable.
--- On Sun, 1/8/10, walto <calhorn@xxxxxxx> wrote:
From: walto <calhorn@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [C] [Wittrs] [quickphilosophy] Wittgenstein contra Kant and
Darwin/Dennett
To: quickphilosophy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sunday, 1 August, 2010, 12:02 AM
You chose to allow wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx even though this message failed
authentication
Click to disallow
|
Other related posts:
- » [Wittrs] Re: [C] [quickphilosophy] Wittgenstein contra Kant and Darwin/Dennett - Rajasekhar Goteti
