[windows2000] Re: Problem with a users Outlook 2000 Mailbox

  • From: "Chris Berry" <compjma@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:34:55 -0700

From: "Brian Anderson" <BAnderson@xxxxxxxxxx>
definitely, more ram will make the difference if it takes 25 minutes or 9 hours to run. The couple times I've had to run it on fairly large pst files, I had to change the virtual memory settings on the machine to get it to run quicker. The machines were standard with 128, but I set the virtual memory to be a static size bigger than the pst file. Worked wonders.

Then just set it back when you're done

Which is just one more reason why we build our workstations with extra ram. I'll still never understand why they always try to sell you a 2 gig processor with only a 128mb of ram, that's like having a 455cu in. engine with a two barrel stock carburetor, just doesn't make any sense.

Chris Berry
Systems Administrator
JM Associates

"We are successful when our bosses wonder what it is we do all day." -- Tim Mullen

Never get a busy signal because you are always connected with high-speed Internet access. Click here to comparison-shop providers. https://broadband.msn.com

This Week's Sponsor - RTO Software / TScale
What's keeping you from getting more from your terminal servers? Did you know, in 
most cases, CPU Utilization IS NOT the single biggest constraint to scaling up?! 
Get this free white paper to understand the real constraints & how to overcome 
them. SAVE MONEY by scaling-up rather than buying more servers.
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.


Other related posts: