[windows2000] Re: Database comparison
- From: Mike Dillinger <miked@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Chris Berry <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 16:08:05 -0700
--- Original Message
From: Chris Berry <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, June 05, 2004 at 12:03PM PDT
CB> Cost is definitely a factor, one of the things I'm trying to figure out
CB> is if Oracle will result in less downtime loss.
Here is a list of companies that are using PostgreSQL:
http://techdocs.postgresql.org/techdocs/supportcontracts.php/
That's a pretty impressive list. I don't think those companies would be
using it if there was even some downtime.
From my experience, PostgreSQL is faster than Oracle as well. It has
some cool data types I don't recall seeing in MySQL (but I haven't used
MySQL in eons, so they may have them now).
-MikeD
********************************************************
This Weeks Sponsor StressedPuppy.com Games
Feeling stressed out? Check out our games to
relieve your stress.
http://www.StressedPuppy.com
********************************************************
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
Other related posts:
