[windows2000] Re: DHCP/DNS & GPO question

  • From: Bill Beckett <Bill.Beckett@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:46:44 -0400

Ok just curious. Not saying one practice is better than the other just
wondering if it could not be done why.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lane, Mark [SMTP:MDL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 11:37 AM
> To:   'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject:      [windows2000] Re: DHCP/DNS & GPO question
> 
> Better yet, set the next in line to be the local secondary dns for fault
> tolerance.
> 
> You probably could, but as a best practice, it is more efficient for the
> local DNS to cache lookups from the ISP than to have each client passing
> lookup traffic to the internet.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Beckett [mailto:Bill.Beckett@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:30 AM
> To: 'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: [windows2000] Re: DHCP/DNS & GPO question
> 
> 
> Why couldn't they setup the first DNS server on the workstation to be the
> local and the next in line be the ISP DNS server?
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:       Lane, Mark [SMTP:MDL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent:       Monday, August 04, 2003 11:21 AM
> > To: 'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> > Subject:    [windows2000] Re: DHCP/DNS & GPO question
> > 
> > You should configure DNS for your workstations using a local server.
> Then
> > configure the local DNS server to use forwarders.  Any requests for
> > resolution that cannot be done locally can be forwarded to your ISP DNS.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Herchenbach, Jim [mailto:jherchenbach@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 9:32 AM
> > To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [windows2000] DHCP/DNS & GPO question
> > 
> > 
> > Ok,  I'm stumped....
> > Win2k Server with SP4, same on clients.
> > I have my DHCP handing out my ISP DNS addresses in this order ISP1 ISP2
> > LocalServer
> > Statics on the Server are in the same order.
> > With this config, the clients can access all shares, and the internet
> > works,
> > but no GPO's are loaded.
> >  
> > I change the configuration order to LocalServer ISP1 ISP2
> > Statics stay the same
> > With this config, the clients load the GPO's fine, shares work fine, but
> I
> > can not access the internet.
> >  
> > any help would be greatly appreciated, as school is starting soon.
> >  
> > jim at school
> >  << File: ATT00010.html >> 
> This weeks sponsor - RTOSoft TScale 
> Complaints about applications response time - DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!
> TScale 2.0 improves applications response time and increases terminal
> server capacity. Really get MORE from your existing servers! Free eval:
> http://www.rtosoft.com/enter.asp?id=131
> ==================================
> To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
> mode or view archives use the below link.
> 
> http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
> This weeks sponsor - RTOSoft TScale 
> Complaints about applications response time - DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!
> TScale 2.0 improves applications response time and increases terminal
> server capacity. Really get MORE from your existing servers! Free eval:
> http://www.rtosoft.com/enter.asp?id=131
> ==================================
> To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
> mode or view archives use the below link.
> 
> http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
This weeks sponsor - RTOSoft TScale 
Complaints about applications response time - DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!
TScale 2.0 improves applications response time and increases terminal
server capacity. Really get MORE from your existing servers! Free eval:
http://www.rtosoft.com/enter.asp?id=131
==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.

http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm

Other related posts: