Perhaps we are observing problematic design in action here. So, a note to the list admin: Consider setting the reply-to address as the original sender rather than the group. From my experience, that is the more conventional setting, and it would appear that others have similar expectations. -Anders On 9/28/02 7:25 PM, Grant Larimer at grant@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Shoot, I just did it too. Sorry > > Grant Larimer > 646.279.3426 > grant@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe send a blank message with unsubscribe in the subject to > webproducers-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To access our webform (instead of sending e-mail) for popular commands > including subscribe, unsubscribe, digest, and vacation visit > www.WebProducers.org. You can also access the list archive at the website. > > Questions and comments are welcome just e-mail me, morry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx __________________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe send a blank message with unsubscribe in the subject to webproducers-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To access our webform (instead of sending e-mail) for popular commands including subscribe, unsubscribe, digest, and vacation visit www.WebProducers.org. You can also access the list archive at the website. Questions and comments are welcome just e-mail me, morry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx