Re: [tuning-math] Glumma
- From: Gene W Smith <genewardsmith@xxxxxxxx>
- To: tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 23:17:19 -0700
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 20:48:36 -0700 Carl Lumma <carl@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I just played a bit with glumma, recta3c1 (or whatever it
> is), and stellhex on my keyboard. My conclusion is that
> none of them are worth the trouble. I wonder if the
> periodicity blocks that define them share any properties
> that we can avoid in the future!
Periodicity blocks? They aren't epimorphic/CS. They really aren't very
regular, which I presume is why you don't like them.
____________________________________________________________
To learn how to configure this list via e-mail (subscribe,
unsubscribe, etc.), send a message to listar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with the subject line "info tuning-math". Or visit the
website: < //www.freelists.org/list/tuning-math > .
Other related posts:
