re: Compton/Erlich temperament
- From: "Paul H. Erlich" <PErlich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <tuning-math@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 14:49:33 -0400
I don't know if there's a way to reply directly to a message in the list
archive, so this is my best attempt:
Carl wrote:
>How do we classify the Compton/Erlich scheme of tuning multiple
>12-et keyboards 15 cents apart? Some sort of planar temperament
>with the following commas?
>531441/524288 (pythagorean comma)
>5120/5103 (difference between syntonic comma and 64/63)
>Is this right?
>-Carl
i don't know who compton is, but as for erlich, oddly enough, gene answered
this correctly a while back, but seems to have forgotten . . .
it's a linear temperament with the following comma:
531441/524288 (pythagorean comma)
15 cents is surely optimal in this context, right?
____________________________________________________________
To learn how to configure this list via e-mail (subscribe,
unsubscribe, etc.), send a message to listar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with the subject line "info tuning-math". Or visit the
website: < http://www.freelists.org/list/tuning-math > .
- Follow-Ups:
- re: Compton/Erlich temperament
- From: Carl Lumma
Other related posts:
- » Compton/Erlich temperament
- » [tuning-math] Re: Compton/Erlich temperament
- » re: Compton/Erlich temperament
- » re: Compton/Erlich temperament
- re: Compton/Erlich temperament
- From: Carl Lumma