[tuning-math] Re: A common notation for JI and ETs

--- In tuning-math@xxxx, David C Keenan <d.keenan@xxxx> wrote [#4532]:
> [a lengthy reply] ...
>
> Whew!
> 
> With that I must sadly inform you that I will not be able to 
contribute to this discussion again for quite some time. I need to 
get seriously involved in an electronic design project for some 
months now. The trouble is I'm a tuning theory addict. I can't have 
just a little.
> 
> George, I strongly encourage you to present what we've agreed upon 
so far,  to the wider community for comment.
> 
> Regards,
> -- Dave Keenan

Dave,

Thank you for your latest comments and ideas.

It will take me some time to digest and thoughtfully consider all of 
what you discussed.  I have also been busy with other things for the 
past few weeks and will not be looking at this in detail for at least 
a few more, at which time I will be able to review all of this with a 
fresher perspective.

So I expect that it will be at least a month before I present 
anything about what we have accomplished.  And once that's started, I 
imagine that it's going to take a while to cover, given that there 
will probably be a lot of questions.

So let's both enjoy our summer break.

Best regards,

--George


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Save on REALTOR Fees
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Xw80LD/h1ZEAA/Ey.GAA/wHYolB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
tuning-math-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


____________________________________________________________

To learn how to configure this list via e-mail (subscribe,
unsubscribe, etc.), send a message to listar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with the subject line "info tuning-math".  Or visit the
website:  < http://www.freelists.org/list/tuning-math > .

Other related posts: