[THIN] Re: windows 2003 seamless apps running on XP desktops...

  • From: Dogers <dogers@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:47:32 +0100

Ooh, further to that, it seems it turns off literally EVERYTHING - no
font smoothing (cleartype or standard!), no full window while moving,
the works :o

Andrew

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:42:02 +0100, Dogers <dogers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> (GMail didnt like your reply Brian, it made it into a new thread for
> some reason :) )
> 
> The policy changes between nothing and let windows decide (ie, do
> whatcha can to look pretty, but go borderline on chugging!)
> 
> Andrew
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:53:39 +1000, Rick Mack <rick.mack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> > Hi Brian,
> >
> > Sorry, came on a bit heavy.
> >
> > There's nothing intrinsically wrong with the XP interface, except for the 
> > huge waste involved in supporting visual effects. Get a really old machine 
> > and run XP on it with My Computer > properties > advanced > performance set 
> > to either best appearance or best performance. Where CPU is limited, it 
> > makes a huge difference to the perception of speed.
> >
> > However there's nothing wrong with the XP user interface once animations 
> > are disabled.
> >
> > Just include the following unmanaged policy snippet in your TS policy 
> > templates, disable visual effects and you can have the best of both worlds.
> >
> > --------------------------
> > CLASS USER
> >
> > CATEGORY "Visual Effects"
> > KEYNAME "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\VisualEffects"
> >     POLICY "Visual Effects"
> >         PART "Disable Visual Effects"    CHECKBOX
> >   VALUENAME "VisualFXSetting"
> >       VALUEOFF NUMERIC 0
> >       VALUEON  NUMERIC 2
> >         END PART
> >     END POLICY
> >
> > END CATEGORY ; visual effects
> > -----------------------
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Rick
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Lilley, Brian
> > Sent: Tue 12/10/2004 6:39 PM
> > To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> > Subject: [THIN] Re: windows 2003 seamless apps running on XP desktops...
> >
> > Hi Mark, many thanks for your response
> >
> >
> >  some comments inline....
> >
> >         -----Original Message-----
> >         From: Rick Mack [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Rick 
> > Mack
> >         Sent: 11 October 2004 23:57
> >         To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >         Subject: RE: [THIN] windows 2003 seamless apps running on XP 
> > desktops...
> >
> >         Hi Brian,
> >
> >         Calling the XP interface a "rich" user interface is actually quite 
> > correct. It costs a lot more and aside from making things pretty, adds 
> > nothing to the functionality of the base item. Efficient and functional is 
> > beautiful too.
> >         [Lilley, Brian] very true indeed.
> >
> >         There are 2 good reasons for not even considering running any of 
> > the special effects on terminal services. The first is an increased CPU 
> > overhead and the second a significant bandwidth utilization increase. ANY 
> > animation, be it fades or whatever has an overhead and across a WAN will 
> > produce a perceived reduction in performance. Updating bitmaps takes cpu, 
> > bandwidth and time.
> >         [Lilley, Brian]  I totally agree, that a TS design should cut out 
> > unnecessary flashy gizmos, but, at the same time we can't remain with 
> > legacy look and feel. Is the XP look and feel really going to cost that 
> > much?
> >
> >         Log in via a WAN connection, use Excel, enable "feedback with 
> > animation" and insert a column in a spreadsheet. Now do it with "feedback 
> > wih animation" turned off. Which one's better?
> >         [Lilley, Brian] I totally agree.
> >
> >         Users will complain a lot less about a plain user interface than 
> > they will if it's slow.
> >         [Lilley, Brian] Absolutely, however will the XP look and feel cost 
> > that much?
> >
> >         The latest client, with MPS 3.0 does support other skins for 
> > seamless apps, but that overhead is largely borne at the client end so 
> > doesn't have a significant effect on performance.
> >         [Lilley, Brian] ah, ok... so does that mean we can have XP look and 
> > feel at little cost.
> >
> >         regards,
> >
> >         Rick
> >
> >         Ulrich Mack
> >         Volante Systems
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> >         From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Lilley, Brian
> >         Sent: Mon 11/10/2004 11:43 PM
> >         To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> >         Subject: [THIN] windows 2003 seamless apps running on XP desktops...
> >
> >         hi list,
> >
> >         I understand that the XP theme is not available by default on 
> > windows 2003
> >         servers.  I assume this is because you don't need a rich user 
> > interface on a
> >         server.  Ok, well if that server is a terminal server then you do 
> > potentially
> >         want that rich interface (for well connected ICA/RDP clients).
> >
> >         So, my question is this, does anyone know the level of overhead 
> > required for
> >         the XP look and feel relative to the classic stylie?  I guess the 
> > overhead
> >         here is two fold, firstly, one CPU overhead to render  rounded 
> > corners and
> >         other XP 'stuff'... and the other overhead is in transmitting this 
> > down an ICA
> >         channel, i.e. does it actually require additional bandwidth.
> >
> >         Also, what would happen with transparent windowy bits  I understand 
> > the win32
> >         client released with FR3 for xp included support for LUNA (.net) 
> > seamless
> >         apps, although ... I've never tried it...
> >
> >         any thoughts on the subject appreciated...
> >
> >         Brianos :o)
> >
> >         
> > ==============================================================================
> >         This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you 
> > received
> >         this message in error please delete it and notify us. If this 
> > message was
> >         misdirected, CSFB does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. 
> > CSFB
> >         retains and monitors electronic communications sent through its 
> > network.
> >         Instructions transmitted over this system are not binding on CSFB 
> > until they
> >         are confirmed by us. Message transmission is not guaranteed to be 
> > secure.
> >         
> > ==============================================================================
> >
> >         ********************************************************
> >         This Weeks Sponsor RTO Software
> >         Do you know which applications are abusing your CPU and memory?
> >         Would you like to learn? --   Free for a limited time!
> >         Get the RTO Performance Analyzer to quickly learn the applications, 
> > users,
> >         and time of day possible problems exist.
> >         http://www.rtosoft.com/enter.asp?id=320
> >         **********************************************************
> >         Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
> >         http://thin.net/links.cfm
> >         ***********************************************************
> >         For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> >         set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> >         http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm
> >
> >         
> > #####################################################################################
> >
> >         This e-mail, including all attachments, may be confidential or 
> > privileged. Confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost because this 
> > e-mail has been sent to you in error. If you are not the intended recipient 
> > any use, disclosure or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have 
> > received it in error please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail 
> > and destroy all copies of this e-mail and any attachments. All liability 
> > for direct and indirect loss arising from this e-mail and any attachments 
> > is hereby disclaimed to the extent permitted by law.
> >
> >         
> > #####################################################################################
> >
> >         
> > #####################################################################################
> >         This e-mail, including all attachments, may be confidential or 
> > privileged. Confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost because this 
> > e-mail has been sent to you in error. If you are not the intended recipient 
> > any use, disclosure or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have 
> > received it in error please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail 
> > and destroy all copies of this e-mail and any attachments. All liability 
> > for direct and indirect loss arising from this e-mail and any attachments 
> > is hereby disclaimed to the extent permitted by law.
> >         
> > #####################################################################################
> >
> > ==============================================================================
> > This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you received 
> > this message in error please delete it and notify us. If this message was 
> > misdirected, CSFB does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. CSFB 
> > retains and monitors electronic communications sent through its network. 
> > Instructions transmitted over this system are not binding on CSFB until 
> > they are confirmed by us. Message transmission is not guaranteed to be 
> > secure.
> > ==============================================================================
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > #####################################################################################
> > This e-mail, including all attachments, may be confidential or privileged.  
> > Confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost because this e-mail has 
> > been sent to you in error.  If you are not the intended recipient any use, 
> > disclosure or copying of this e-mail is prohibited.  If you have received 
> > it in error please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and 
> > destroy all copies of this e-mail and any attachments.  All liability for 
> > direct and indirect loss arising from this e-mail and any attachments is 
> > hereby disclaimed to the extent permitted by law.
> > #####################################################################################
> >
> >
>
********************************************************
This Weeks Sponsor RTO Software
Do you know which applications are abusing your CPU and memory?
Would you like to learn? --   Free for a limited time!
Get the RTO Performance Analyzer to quickly learn the applications, users,
and time of day possible problems exist.
http://www.rtosoft.com/enter.asp?id=320
********************************************************** 
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
http://thin.net/links.cfm
***********************************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or 
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm

Other related posts: