[THIN] Re: XML Request size repost

  • From: "BRUTON, Malcolm, FM" <Malcolm.BRUTON@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:51:18 -0000

No

I trust thethin list more !!!

Have a good weekend
Malcolm
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Braebaum, Neil
Sent: 20 January 2006 10:41
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: XML Request size repost


Sorry I couldn't be of more help.

I guess as you say, it's only the people who've had to cross this bridge,
that'll really have anything to add to make you feel any better over it.

Have you posted in the Citrix forums, too?

Cheers

Neil 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of BRUTON, Malcolm, FM
> Sent: 20 January 2006 10:38
> To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: [THIN] Re: XML Request size repost
> 
> AD users with nested groups already.  However we have a large
> number of legacy SID History groups which is why it is so 
> large.  You are right.
> Citrix just shrug and say test it.  We have but that is 
> different than releasing it into production on a live system.
> 
> Hoping someone else had come across this issue before and
> could give indication what safe figures were or what issues 
> they faced. 
> 
> Thanks Neil
> 
> Malcolm
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Braebaum, Neil
> Sent: 20 January 2006 10:14
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: XML Request size repost
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> > On Behalf Of BRUTON, Malcolm, FM
> > Sent: 20 January 2006 10:06
> > To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> > Subject: [THIN] XML Request size repost
> > 
> > Got the following error when trying to use WI3 with XPe FR3 (+
> > hotfixes) and Single Sign on turned on
> > 
> > "Error: The MetaFrame server farm cannot process your
> request at this
> > time.
> > Error: Citrix XML Service request too large, more than 4096
> bytes [413
> > request too large]."
> > 
> > Implementing the fix in point 2 from article
> > 
> > http://support.citrix.com/article/entry.jspa?entryID=2205
> > <http://support.citrix.com/article/entry.jspa?entryID=2205>
> >  
> > Fixes it.
> > However we have to increase this from 4096 to approx 80,000 to get
> > this to work for a user who is a member of approx 500 groups.
> 
> Are these AD users?
> 
> And / or could you truncate the number of group memberships
> by using nested groups?
> 
> > Seem a bit excessive to have to take this form 4 k to 80k
> to get it to
> > work.
> 
> I'm guessing they expect direct group memberships to be
> modest. To be equitable, having many group memberships is not ideal.
> 
> > My understanding is we need approx
> > 32 bytes per group.  We have an average of 250 group
> memberships per
> > user with the max at 800. Any ideas if the XML service is stable at
> > say 100K or will not cause issues?
> 
> <shrug> I'd be surprised if Citrix or anybody else give you a
> firm steer, unless they've confirmed such a thing themselves.
> 
> > What is impact on servers doing XML requests or network traffic.
> > Should we set on all servers or only servers handling XML requests?
> 
> Just those running the XML service.
> 
> Neil



****************************************************************************
*
This email and its attachments are confidential and are intended for the
above named recipient only. If this has come to you in error, please notify
the sender immediately and delete this email from your system. You must take
no action based on this, nor must you copy or disclose it or any part of its
contents to any person or organisation. Statements and opinions contained in
this email may not necessarily represent those of Littlewoods Shop Direct
Group Limited or its subsidiaries. Please note that email communications may
be monitored. The registered office of Littlewoods Shop Direct Group Limited
is 100 Old Hall Street Liverpool L70 1AB registered number 5059352
****************************************************************************
*




This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl -
www.blackspider.com
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or 
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************


***********************************************************************************
The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. Registered in Scotland No 90312. Registered 
Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB. 
Authorized and regulated by the Financial Services Authority 
 
This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the 
addressee only. If the message is received by anyone other 
than the addressee, please return the message to the sender 
by replying to it and then delete the message from your 
computer. Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The 
Royal Bank of Scotland plc does not accept responsibility for 
changes made to this message after it was sent. 

Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the 
transmission of viruses, it is the responsibility of the recipient to 
ensure that the onward transmission, opening or use of this 
message and any attachments will not adversely affect its 
systems or data. No responsibility is accepted by The Royal 
Bank of Scotland plc in this regard and the recipient should carry 
out such virus and other checks as it considers appropriate. 
Visit our websites at: 
http://www.rbos.com
http://www.rbsmarkets.com 
********************************************************************************

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or 
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************

Other related posts: